ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Effectiveness of Glycated Haemoglobin in the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus among Pregnant Women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.AJOG global reports · 2026Review
- Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) as a Diagnostic Criterion for Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic complication in pregnancy with a broad range of adverse foetal and maternal outcomes if not properly managed. Due to the difficult nature of the Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the utilization of the Glycatedhaemoglobin (HbA1c) test as a simpler and acceptable alternative has been suggested. The aims were to determine the GDM prevalence, the diagnostic accuracy, the optimal cut-off point and the validity of the HbA1c in diagnosing GDM using OGTT as the gold standard in the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH). Methodology: This was a prospective cross-sectional study involving a cohort of 250 antenatal attendees at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy in the UPTH from 1st February 2018 - 30th April 2018. Socio-demographic data and results of the OGTT and HbA1c tests were analysed using SPSS 21.0 for windows® statistical software. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c. The Youden index was used to get the optimal cut-off point for HbA1c. The validity of the HbA1c was determined using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The P-value at p<0.05 was set as the level of significance. Results: Out of the 250 women, 36 (14.4%) had GDM hence in this study, the GDM prevalence was 14.4%. Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.649; 95% confidence interval: 0.550 - 0.748; p-value = 0.004. The optimal cut-off point for HbA1c was 5.18% with a sensitivity of 63.9%, a specificity of 59.3%, a positive predictive value of 20.9% and a negative predictive value of 90.7%. Conclusion: The HbA1c at the Optimal cut-off point of 5.18% in our environment cannot replace the OGTT in the diagnosis of GDM because of its low sensitivity and specificity but will be useful in the screening for GDM because of its high negative predictive value at 24-28 weeks gestation. This will reduce the count of gravidae who undergo the cumbersome OGTT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.