Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694184›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Effectiveness of Different Etching Agents on Enamel Surface and Shear Bond Strength: An In Vitro Evaluation.

Bharvi Jani, Alap Shah, Chetan Shankar, Siddharth Revankar, Hetanshi S Shukla, Karthikeyan Ramalingam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Novel Etching System on Etch Pattern in Primary Teeth: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bharvi JaniOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.
Alap ShahOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.
Chetan ShankarOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND.
Siddharth RevankarOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Maratha Mandal's Nathajirao G. Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi, IND.
Hetanshi S ShuklaOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.
Karthikeyan RamalingamOral Pathology and Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Manubhai Patel Dental College and Hospital · INSaveetha University · INK.S. Hegde Hospital · INSatavahana University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Enamel etching is of utmost importance during the orthodontic bonding procedure. Phosphoric acid, hydrofluoric acid, and citric acid are used in specific concentrations to create surface irregularities on enamel surfaces, enhancing the bond strength of the orthodontic attachment. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the type of etchant for reliable orthodontic bracket bonding with minimal damage to the enamel surface. Aims and objectives This study aimed to investigate the morphological changes on the enamel surface after treatment with different surface etchants, assess the depth of penetration, and evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets. Materials and methods One hundred and one extracted premolar teeth were used to investigate morphological changes on the enamel surface treated with 37% phosphoric acid, 11% hydrofluoric acid, and 20% citric acid. It was evaluated on a scanning electron microscope (Jeol Scientific Equipment, Jeol Limited, Akishima, Japan), and the SBS of brackets on enamel treated with different etching agents was evaluated using an Instron Universal Testing Machine (UTM; Instron Model: 5982, Universal Testing Systems, Norwood, MA). Group A had 60 test samples. Group B had 40 test samples. One control without any acid etching was used in both groups. Subgroup A1 (n = 30) was evaluated for surface characteristics of acid-etched enamel. Subgroup A2 was assessed for the penetration depth of various etchants. Group B (n = 40) was tested for SBS. The results were tabulated and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Post hoc Tukey HSD test and one-way analysis of variance were used to assess SBS and penetration depth of etchants (P ≤ 0.05). Pearson's correlation test was used to correlate SBS, etching pattern, and penetration depth. The chi-square test was used to test the frequency of types of etching patterns.  Results Intergroup correlations between etching depth, etching pattern evaluated on SEM, and SBS evaluated on the UTM showed a high statistical correlation between etching depth & SBS, etching depth & etching pattern, and SBS & etching pattern between A1, A2, and group B (P ≤ 0.001). A highly significant negative correlation between SBS & etching pattern (P = 0.42) was observed among intra-group correlation. Non-significant correlations were found between etching depth & SBS and etching depth & etching pattern within the 20% citric acid etch group (P = 0.370 and 0.141, respectively). Conclusion Penetration depth obtained was highest with 11% hydrofluoric acid, followed by 37% phosphoric acid and 20% citric acid. In addition, 11% hydrofluoric acid showed the highest bond strength. Acid etching showed better penetration depth and bond strength than control.

Indexed as

acid etchingcitric acidetching depthetching patternhydrofluoric acidorthodonticsphosphoric acidscanning electron microscopyshear bond strengthuniversal testing machine

Identifiers

PMID38694184
PMCPMC11062641
OpenAlexW4391735309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.