Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694183›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2022

Smoothed Nested Testing on Directed Acyclic Graphs.

J H Loper, L Lei, W Fithian, W Tansey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Filtering the rejection set while preserving false discovery rate control.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023
    Article
  2. DART: Distance Assisted Recursive Testing.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J H LoperDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, 716 Jerome L. Greene Building, New York, New York 10025, U.S.A.
L LeiDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Sequoia Hall, Palo Alto, California 94305, U.S.A.
W FithianDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, 367 Evans Hall, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A.
W TanseyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St., New York, New York 10065, U.S.A.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Probabilistic Multiscale Modeling of the Tumor MicroenvironmentR37CA271186 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Wesley Tansey · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R37 CA271186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the problem of multiple hypothesis testing when there is a logical nested structure to the hypotheses. When one hypothesis is nested inside another, the outer hypothesis must be false if the inner hypothesis is false. We model the nested structure as a directed acyclic graph, including chain and tree graphs as special cases. Each node in the graph is a hypothesis and rejecting a node requires also rejecting all of its ancestors. We propose a general framework for adjusting node-level test statistics using the known logical constraints. Within this framework, we study a smoothing procedure that combines each node with all of its descendants to form a more powerful statistic. We prove a broad class of smoothing strategies can be used with existing selection procedures to control the familywise error rate, false discovery exceedance rate, or false discovery rate, so long as the original test statistics are independent under the null. When the null statistics are not independent but are derived from positively-correlated normal observations, we prove control for all three error rates when the smoothing method is arithmetic averaging of the observations. Simulations and an application to a real biology dataset demonstrate that smoothing leads to substantial power gains.

Indexed as

Directed acyclic graphFalse discovery rateFalse exceedance rateFamilywise error rateMultiple testingNested hypothesisPartially ordered hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID38694183
PMCPMC11061840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.