Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694167›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Getting cozy with causality: Advances to the causal pathway diagramming method to enhance implementation precision.

Predrag Klasnja, Rosemary D Meza, Michael D Pullmann, Kayne D Mettert, Rene Hawkes, Lorella Palazzo, Bryan J Weiner, Cara C Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Investigating the Role of Situational Disruptors in Engagement with Digital Mental Health Tools.CSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Predrag KlasnjaSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rosemary D MezaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael D PullmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-864X
Kayne D MettertKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1750-7863
Rene HawkesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lorella PalazzoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bryan J WeinerHans Rosling Center Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8920-8075

Funding

Psychology Training in Alcohol Research (PTAR)T32AA007455 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARY E. LARIMER · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
Project 3P50MH126219 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEINER, BRYAN J. · 2021 to 2024
$5.9M
Optimizing Implementation in Cancer Control: OPTICC - Research Program CoreP50CA244432 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2019 to 2023
$4.6M
MECHANISMS: The MECHANics of Implementation Strategies and MeasureSR01CA262325 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEINER, BRYAN J. · 2021 to 2023
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244432NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262325NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007455NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH126219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implementation strategies are theorized to work well when carefully matched to implementation determinants and when factors-preconditions, moderators, etc.-that influence strategy effectiveness are prospectively identified and addressed. Existing methods for strategy selection are either imprecise or require significant technical expertise and resources, undermining their utility. This article outlines refinements to causal pathway diagrams (CPDs), a method for articulating the causal process through which implementation strategies work and offers illustrations of their use. Method: CPDs are a visualization tool to represent an implementation strategy, its mechanism(s) (i.e., the processes through which a strategy is thought to operate), determinants it is intended to address, factors that may impede or facilitate its effectiveness, and the series of outcomes that should be expected if the strategy is operating as intended. We offer principles for constructing CPDs and describe their key functions. Results: Applications of the CPD method by study teams from two National Institute of Health-funded Implementation Science Centers and a research grant are presented. These include the use of CPDs to (a) match implementation strategies to determinants, (b) understand the conditions under which an implementation strategy works, and (c) develop causal theories of implementation strategies. Conclusions: CPDs offer a novel method for implementers to select, understand, and improve the effectiveness of implementation strategies. They make explicit theoretical assumptions about strategy operation while supporting practical planning. Early applications have led to method refinements and guidance for the field.

Indexed as

causal pathwayimplementation determinantsimplementation outcomesimplementation strategymechanisms of actiontheory

Identifiers

PMID38694167
PMCPMC11062231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.