Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694119›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma: An overview of pathophysiology and advancements in treatment.

Lihui Ge, Linlin Wang, Dongmei Pei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lihui GeDepartment of Health Management, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Linlin WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Dongmei PeiDepartment of Health Management, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma (PMA), a distinct subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is characterized by an abundance of mucin-producing cells. Although this subtype comprises a relatively small fraction of lung adenocarcinomas, PMA stands apart due to its unique clinical, pathological, and molecular features. This review comprehensively discusses the pathophysiology and etiology, clinical features, diagnostic methods, treatment strategies, prognosis, and future directions for PMA, drawing from relevant literature and existing studies. Advances in PMA treatment includes surgical intervention, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and adjuvant therapy. Particularly, we discussed factors influencing the prognosis of PMAs, such as molecular markers, pathological features, and the impact of the latest treatment advances on prognosis. Moreover, we intended this review to be a comprehensive reference for diagnosing, treating, and assessing the prognosis of PMA, providing valuable guidance for clinical practice.

Indexed as

KRAS mutationsNSCLCPrognosticPulmonary mucinous adenocarcinomaTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID38694119
PMCPMC11058725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.