ArticleHeliyon2024
Grading of glioma tumors using digital holographic microscopy.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Holographic Microscopy for Phenotypic Profiling of Adherent Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Label-Free Cancer Detection Methods Based on Biophysical Cell Phenotypes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common type of cerebral tumors; they occur with increasing incidence in the last decade and have a high rate of mortality. For efficient treatment, fast accurate diagnostic and grading of tumors are imperative. Presently, the grading of tumors is established by histopathological evaluation, which is a time-consuming procedure and relies on the pathologists' experience. Here we propose a supervised machine learning procedure for tumor grading which uses quantitative phase images of unstained tissue samples acquired by digital holographic microscopy. The algorithm is using an extensive set of statistical and texture parameters computed from these images. The procedure has been able to classify six classes of images (normal tissue and five glioma subtypes) and to distinguish between gliomas types from grades II to IV (with the highest sensitivity and specificity for grade II astrocytoma and grade III oligodendroglioma and very good scores in recognizing grade III anaplastic astrocytoma and grade IV glioblastoma). The procedure bolsters clinical diagnostic accuracy, offering a swift and reliable means of tumor characterization and grading, ultimately the enhancing treatment decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.