ReviewHeliyon2024
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic Analysis of Ocular Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates: Insights From a Predominantly Asian, Multi-Regional Dataset.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Bacterial diversity, quantitative risk assessment of spring waterborne pathogens and their biocontrol through phyto-biosorbents.PloS one · 2026Article
- Tibetan Medicine Liuwei Dingxiang Pills Decoction InhibitsInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Metagenomic insights into microbial communities and antibiotic resistance in treated wastewater for urban irrigation.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- A Novel Aptamer Selection Strategy forMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Role of Water as a Reservoir for Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Metabolomics reveals the mechanisms of action of fosfomycin and azithromycin combination in the treatment ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- First report of MDR virulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa in apparently healthy Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to examine the existence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.