Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694012›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2024

Participants with restricted dominant shoulder internal rotation range of motion demonstrate no side-to-side difference in humeral head translation; and no difference before and after joint mobilization: a pilot study.

John F Hoops, Troy L Hooper, Stéphane Sobczak, Jeegisha Kapila, Birendra M Dewan, Omer C Matthijs, Jean-Michel Brismée

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John F HoopsNorthern Arizona University: 208 E Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA.
Troy L HooperDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, USA.
Stéphane SobczakChaire de Recherche en Anatomie Fonctionnelle, Groupe de Recherche Sur Les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques, Département d'Anatomie, Université Du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Jeegisha KapilaDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of North Texas, Health Science Center at Fort Worth, USA.
Birendra M DewanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Long Island University, USA.
Omer C MatthijsInternational Academy of Orthopedic Medicine, Germany.
Jean-Michel BrisméeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, USA.
Texas Tech University · USLong Island University · USUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CAUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] To compare humeral head translation (HHT) during shoulder elevation between dominant and non-dominant shoulders in participants with limited dominant shoulder internal rotation range of motion (ROM). To determine if joint mobilization alters HHT, and if relationships exist between the bicipital forearm angle and HHT. [Participants and Methods] Fifteen (9 female) participants (age 25.7 ± 6.8 years) with a minimum 15-degree dominant shoulder internal rotation ROM deficit compared to the opposite shoulder participated. All participants underwent bicipital forearm angle (BFA) measurements and ultrasound imaging to measure acromiohumeral and posterior glenohumeral distances in 3 positions: Resting, 90 degrees of shoulder flexion, and 60 degrees of shoulder abduction with full external rotation. Ultrasound images were used to calculate HHT. Participants' dominant shoulders underwent posterior glide mobilization, followed immediately by repeated ultrasound images and ROM measures. [Results] There was no dominant to non-dominant shoulder, or before and after mobilization HHT differences. No correlations existed between bicipital forearm angles and HHT or ROM gains after mobilization. [Conclusion] Participants with internal rotation ROM loss demonstrated symmetrical HHT. Joint mobilization increased ROM, but HHT was unchanged. No relationships existed between BFA and HHT.

Indexed as

Humeral retroversionJoint mobilizationJoint translation

Identifiers

PMID38694012
PMCPMC11060773
OpenAlexW4396529901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.