ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2024
Kinesiophysiological analysis associated with changes in subjective intensities in belt electrode-skeletal muscle electrical stimulation: a prospective exploratory study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and safety of a 6-month outpatient rehabilitation program combining therapeutic electrical stimulation using belt electrodes and nutritional management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Belt Electrode-Skeletal Muscle Electrical Stimulation Prevents Muscle Atrophy in the Soleus of Collagen-Induced Arthritis Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Belt electrode-skeletal muscle electrical stimulation (B-SES) is a novel electrical muscle stimulation treatment that causes less pain and discomfort and induces contraction in a wider skeletal muscle area than conventional electrodes. However, the stimulation intensity depends on patients' subjectivity. In the present study, B-SES and an expiratory gas device were combined to analyze the kinesiophysiological data associated with changes in subjective intensity. [Participants and Methods] Seventeen healthy participants were recruited. The subjective intensities were set to four conditions (weak, normal, strong, and maximum tolerated intensity), and the stimulation was performed in each condition in the "metabolic mode" (frequency, 4 Hz; pulse width, 250 µs). The primary outcome was metabolic equivalents (METs), and this data were compared for each condition. [Results] METs generated by B-SES were 2.0 (1.0) for weak intensity, 2.7 (1.2) for normal intensity, 3.9 (1.3) for strong intensity, and 5.0 (1.3) for the tolerance limit intensity; differences detected between all subjective intensities were statistically significant. [Conclusion] These findings show that objective intensities of >3 METs, as recommended in rehabilitation prescriptions, can be achieved when the subjective intensity is set at strong or maximum tolerated. Treatment with B-SES may provide a viable alternative to therapeutic exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.