Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38694009›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2024

Kinesiophysiological analysis associated with changes in subjective intensities in belt electrode-skeletal muscle electrical stimulation: a prospective exploratory study.

Norikazu Hishikawa, Koshiro Sawada, Motonori Kubo, Mari Kakita, Takashi Kawasaki, Suzuyo Ohashi, Yasuo Mikami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Norikazu HishikawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine: 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Koshiro SawadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine: 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Motonori KuboDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine: 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Mari KakitaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine: 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Takashi KawasakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine: 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Suzuyo OhashiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine: 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Yasuo MikamiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine: 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] Belt electrode-skeletal muscle electrical stimulation (B-SES) is a novel electrical muscle stimulation treatment that causes less pain and discomfort and induces contraction in a wider skeletal muscle area than conventional electrodes. However, the stimulation intensity depends on patients' subjectivity. In the present study, B-SES and an expiratory gas device were combined to analyze the kinesiophysiological data associated with changes in subjective intensity. [Participants and Methods] Seventeen healthy participants were recruited. The subjective intensities were set to four conditions (weak, normal, strong, and maximum tolerated intensity), and the stimulation was performed in each condition in the "metabolic mode" (frequency, 4 Hz; pulse width, 250 µs). The primary outcome was metabolic equivalents (METs), and this data were compared for each condition. [Results] METs generated by B-SES were 2.0 (1.0) for weak intensity, 2.7 (1.2) for normal intensity, 3.9 (1.3) for strong intensity, and 5.0 (1.3) for the tolerance limit intensity; differences detected between all subjective intensities were statistically significant. [Conclusion] These findings show that objective intensities of >3 METs, as recommended in rehabilitation prescriptions, can be achieved when the subjective intensity is set at strong or maximum tolerated. Treatment with B-SES may provide a viable alternative to therapeutic exercise.

Indexed as

Electrical stimulationMetabolic equivalentStimulation intensity

Identifiers

PMID38694009
PMCPMC11060770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.