Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693596›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

Developing a Machine-Learning Predictive Model for Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Long Chen, Liyi Zhang, Diange Zhou, Shengjie Dong, Dan Xing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Long ChenArthritis Clinical and Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Liyi ZhangOrthopedic Department, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Diange ZhouArthritis Clinical and Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shengjie DongOrthopedic Department, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China.
Dan XingArthritis Clinical and Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-3134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePredicting whether the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) should be preserved during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures is a complex task in the preoperative phase. The choice to either retain or excise the PCL has a substantial effect on the surgical outcomes and biomechanical integrity of the knee joint after the operation. To enhance surgeons' ability to predict the removal and retention of the PCL in patients before TKA, we developed machine learning models. We also identified significant feature factors that contribute to accurate predictions during this process.

methodsPatients' data on TKA continuously performed by a single surgeon who had intended initially to undergo implantation of cruciate-retaining (CR) prostheses was collected. During the sacrifice of PCL, we utilized anterior-stabilized (AS) tibial bearings. The dataset was split into CR and AS categories to form distinct groups. Relevant information regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), the affected side, and preoperative diagnosis was extracted by reviewing the medical records of the patients. To ensure the authenticity of the research, an initial step involved capturing X-ray images before the surgery. These images were then analyzed to determine the height of the medial condyle (MMH) and lateral condyle (LMH), as well as the ratios between MLW and MMH and MLW and LMH. Additionally, the insall-salvati index (ISI) was calculated, and the severity of any varus or valgus deformities was assessed. Eight machine-learning methods were developed to predict the retention of PCL in TKA. Risk factor analysis was performed using the SHApley Additive exPlanations method.

resultsA total of 307 knee joints from 266 patients were included, among which there were 254 females and 53 males. A stratified random sampling technique was used to split patients in a 70:30 ratio into a training dataset and a testing dataset. Eight machine-learning models were trained using data feeding. Except for the AUC of the LGBM Classifier, which is 0.70, the AUCs of other machine learning models are all lower than 0.70. In importance-based analysis, ISI, MMH, LMH, deformity, and age were confirmed as important predictive factors for PCL retention in operations.

conclusionThe LGBM Classifier model achieved the best performance in predicting PCL retention in TKA. Among the potential risk factors, ISI, MMH, LMH, and deformity played essential roles in the prediction of PCL retention.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeMachine LearningPosterior Cruciate LigamentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesKnee jointMachine learningPosterior cruciate ligamentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38693596
PMCPMC11144493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.