Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693519›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Identifying barriers to outpatient appointment attendance in patient groups at risk of inequity: a mixed methods study in a London NHS trust.

Beatrice Sung, Fiona O'Driscoll, Alice Gregory, Kate Grailey, Hannah Franklin, Sharon Poon, Anna Lawrence-Jones, Leila Shepherd, Clare McCrudden, Bob Klaber and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Beatrice Sung *University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Fiona O'Driscoll *Helix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Room 1035/7, QEQM Wing, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1NY, UK. f.odriscoll@imperial.ac.uk.
Alice GregoryHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Room 1035/7, QEQM Wing, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Kate GraileyHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Room 1035/7, QEQM Wing, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Hannah FranklinImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sharon PoonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anna Lawrence-JonesInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Leila ShepherdHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Room 1035/7, QEQM Wing, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Clare McCruddenHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Room 1035/7, QEQM Wing, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Bob KlaberImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Chris PavlakisHelix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, Room 1035/7, QEQM Wing, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Ara DarziInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sarah HufInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Imperial College London UKRI Impact Acceleration Account EPSRC- EP/X52556X/1; MRC- MR/X502959/1; BBSRC - BB/X511055/1Medical Research Council MR/X502959/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is significant health inequity in the United Kingdom (U.K.), with different populations facing challenges accessing health services, which can impact health outcomes. At one London National Health Service (NHS) Trust, data showed that patients from deprived areas and minority ethnic groups had a higher likelihood of missing their first outpatient appointment. This study's objectives were to understand barriers to specific patient populations attending first outpatient appointments, explore systemic factors and assess appointment awareness.

methodsFive high-volume specialties identified as having inequitable access based on ethnicity and deprivation were selected as the study setting. Mixed methods were employed to understand barriers to outpatient attendance, including qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients and staff, observations of staff workflows and interrogation of quantitative data on appointment communication. To identify barriers, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who missed their appointment and were from a minority ethnic group or deprived area. Staff interviews and observations were carried out to further understand attendance barriers. Patient interview data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis to create a thematic framework and triangulated with staff data. Subthemes were mapped onto a behavioural science framework highlighting behaviours that could be targeted. Quantitative data from patient interviews were analysed to assess appointment awareness and communication.

resultsTwenty-six patients and 11 staff were interviewed, with four staff observed. Seven themes were identified as barriers - communication factors, communication methods, healthcare system, system errors, transport, appointment, and personal factors. Knowledge about appointments was an important identified behaviour, supported by eight out of 26 patients answering that they were unaware of their missed appointment. Environmental context and resources were other strongly represented behavioural factors, highlighting systemic barriers that prevent attendance.

conclusionThis study showed the barriers preventing patients from minority ethnic groups or living in deprived areas from attending their outpatient appointment. These barriers included communication factors, communication methods, healthcare the system, system errors, transport, appointment, and personal factors. Healthcare services should acknowledge this and work with public members from these communities to co-design solutions supporting attendance. Our work provides a basis for future intervention design, informed by behavioural science and community involvement.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesHealth Services AccessibilityState MedicineAdultAgedCommunicationEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInterviews as TopicLondonMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsQualitative ResearchAppointmentBehavioural scienceDeprivationDesignEthnic minoritiesHealth inequalityHealth inequityOutpatientPublic involvementUnderserved groups

Identifiers

PMID38693519
PMCPMC11061980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.