Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693515›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

The effect of a neck-specific exercise program on cervical kinesthesia for patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders: a case-control study.

Harpa Ragnarsdottir, Gunnel Peterson, Magnus K Gislason, Gudny L Oddsdottir, Anneli Peolsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03664934 (Pathophysiological Mechanism Behind Prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03664934 nacompletednot on this map

Pathophysiological Mechanism Behind Prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsWhiplash InjuriesArmsExercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Harpa RagnarsdottirResearch Centre of Movement Science, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Iceland, Stapi v/Hringbraut 31, Reykjavik, 101, IS, Iceland.
Gunnel PetersonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Magnus K GislasonInstitute of Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Gudny L OddsdottirResearch Centre of Movement Science, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Iceland, Stapi v/Hringbraut 31, Reykjavik, 101, IS, Iceland.
Anneli PeolssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. anneli.peolsson@liu.se.
Linköping University · SEUniversity of Iceland · ISReykjavík University · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical kinesthesia is an important part of movement control and of great importance for daily function. Previous research on kinesthesia in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) has focused on grades I-II. More research is needed on WAD grade III. The aim of this study was to investigate cervical kinesthesia in individuals with WAD grades II-III before and after a neck-specific exercise intervention and compare them to healthy controls.

methodsA prospective, case-control study with a treatment arm (n = 30) and a healthy control arm (n = 30) was conducted in Sweden. The WAD group received a neck-specific exercise program for 12 weeks. The primary outcome to evaluate kinesthesia was neck movement control (the Fly test). Secondary outcomes were neck disability, dizziness and neck pain intensity before and after the Fly test. Outcomes were measured at baseline and post-treatment. The control arm underwent measurements at baseline except for the dizziness questionnaire. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate difference between groups (WAD and control) and over time, with difficulty level in the Fly test and gender as factors.

resultsBetween-group analysis showed statistically significant differences in three out of five kinesthetic metrics (p = 0.002 to 0.008), but not for the WAD-group follow-up versus healthy control baseline measurements. Results showed significant improvements for the WAD-group over time for three out of five kinaesthesia metrics (p < 0.001 to 0.008) and for neck disability (p < 0.001) and pain (p = 0.005), but not for dizziness (p = 0.70).

conclusionsThe exercise program shows promising results in improving kinesthesia and reducing neck pain and disability in the chronic WAD phase. Future research might benefit from focusing on adding kinesthetic exercises to the exercise protocol and evaluating its beneficial effects on dizziness or further improvement in kinesthesia. IMPACT STATEMENT: Kinesthesia can be improved in chronic WAD patients without the use of specific kinesthetic exercises.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03664934), first registration approved 11/09/2018.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyKinesthesisWhiplash InjuriesAdultCase-Control StudiesCervical VertebraeChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainProspective StudiesSwedenTreatment OutcomeExercise therapyMovement controlRehabilitationSpineWhiplash

Identifiers

PMID38693515
PMCPMC11064421
OpenAlexW4396596977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.