Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693495›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Community screening for dementia among older adults in China: a machine learning-based strategy.

Yan Zhang, Jian Xu, Chi Zhang, Xu Zhang, Xueli Yuan, Wenqing Ni, Hongmin Zhang, Yijin Zheng, Zhiguang Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan ZhangDepartment of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, No.2021, Buxin Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China.
Jian XuDepartment of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, No.2021, Buxin Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China.
Chi ZhangShenzhen Yiwei Technology Company, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China.
Xu ZhangNational Engineering Laboratory of Big Data System Computing Technology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, China.
Xueli YuanDepartment of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, No.2021, Buxin Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China.
Wenqing NiDepartment of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, No.2021, Buxin Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China.
Hongmin ZhangDepartment of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, No.2021, Buxin Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China.
Yijin ZhengDepartment of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, No.2021, Buxin Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China.
Zhiguang ZhaoDepartment of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, No.2021, Buxin Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China. 1498384005@qq.com.
Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control · CNShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia is a leading cause of disability in people older than 65 years worldwide. However, diagnosing dementia in its earliest symptomatic stages remains challenging. This study combined specific questions from the AD8 scale with comprehensive health-related characteristics, and used machine learning (ML) to construct diagnostic models of cognitive impairment (CI).

methodsThe study was based on the Shenzhen Healthy Ageing Research (SHARE) project, and we recruited 823 participants aged 65 years and older, who completed a comprehensive health assessment and cognitive function assessments. Permutation importance was used to select features. Five ML models using BalanceCascade were applied to predict CI: a support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), AdaBoost, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and logistic regression (LR). An AD8 score ≥ 2 was used to define CI as a baseline. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the results of ML models.

resultsThe first and sixth items of AD8, platelets, waist circumference, body mass index, carcinoembryonic antigens, age, serum uric acid, white blood cells, abnormal electrocardiogram, heart rate, and sex were selected as predictive features. Compared to the baseline (AUC = 0.65), the MLP showed the highest performance (AUC: 0.83 ± 0.04), followed by AdaBoost (AUC: 0.80 ± 0.04), SVM (AUC: 0.78 ± 0.04), GBDT (0.76 ± 0.04). Furthermore, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of four ML models were higher than the baseline. SHAP summary plots based on MLP showed the most influential feature on model decision for positive CI prediction was female sex, followed by older age and lower waist circumference.

conclusionsThe diagnostic models of CI applying ML, especially the MLP, were substantially more effective than the traditional AD8 scale with a score of ≥ 2 points. Our findings may provide new ideas for community dementia screening and to promote such screening while minimizing medical and health resources.

Indexed as

DementiaMachine LearningMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleAD8Cognitive impairmentDementiaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38693495
PMCPMC11062005
OpenAlexW4396561716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.