Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693468›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology experimental2024

Artificial intelligence in interventional radiology: state of the art.

Pierluigi Glielmo, Stefano Fusco, Salvatore Gitto, Giulia Zantonelli, Domenico Albano, Carmelo Messina, Luca Maria Sconfienza, Giovanni Mauri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pierluigi GlielmoDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 31, 20133, Milan, Italy. pierluigiglielmo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1692-2986
Stefano FuscoDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Salvatore GittoDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Giulia ZantonelliDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Domenico AlbanoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Cristina Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Carmelo MessinaDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Luca Maria SconfienzaDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni MauriDivisione di Radiologia Interventistica, IEO, IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated great potential in a wide variety of applications in interventional radiology (IR). Support for decision-making and outcome prediction, new functions and improvements in fluoroscopy, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, specifically in the field of IR, have all been investigated. Furthermore, AI represents a significant boost for fusion imaging and simulated reality, robotics, touchless software interactions, and virtual biopsy. The procedural nature, heterogeneity, and lack of standardisation slow down the process of adoption of AI in IR. Research in AI is in its early stages as current literature is based on pilot or proof of concept studies. The full range of possibilities is yet to be explored.Relevance statement Exploring AI's transformative potential, this article assesses its current applications and challenges in IR, offering insights into decision support and outcome prediction, imaging enhancements, robotics, and touchless interactions, shaping the future of patient care.Key points• AI adoption in IR is more complex compared to diagnostic radiology.• Current literature about AI in IR is in its early stages.• AI has the potential to revolutionise every aspect of IR.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiology, InterventionalHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningNeural networks (computer)Radiology (interventional)

Identifiers

PMID38693468
PMCPMC11063019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.