Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693340›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2024

An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.

William W Graves, Hillary J Levinson, Ryan Staples, Olga Boukrina, David Rothlein, Jeremy Purcell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

William W GravesDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Smith Hall, Room 301, 101 Warren Street, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. william.graves@rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1590-2667
Hillary J LevinsonDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Smith Hall, Room 301, 101 Warren Street, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Ryan StaplesGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9440-4767
Olga BoukrinaKessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-2893
David RothleinVA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeremy PurcellUniversity of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-4467
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USGeorgetown University · USKessler Foundation · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

A Novel Approach to Measuring Neural Tuning to Written WordsR21HD107511 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BOLGER, DONALD J, PURCELL, JEREMY JOSEPH · 2022 to 2023
$441k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD107511NIH HHS R21HD107511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine how language is implemented in the brain, it is important to know which brain areas are primarily engaged in language processing and which are not. Existing protocols for localizing language are typically univariate, treating each small unit of brain volume as independent. One prominent example that focuses on the overall language network in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) uses a contrast between neural responses to sentences and sets of pseudowords (pronounceable nonwords). This contrast reliably activates peri-sylvian language areas but is less sensitive to extra-sylvian areas that are also known to support aspects of language such as word meanings (semantics). In this study, we assess areas where a multivariate, pattern-based approach shows high reproducibility across multiple measurements and participants, identifying these areas as multivariate regions of interest (mROI). We then perform a representational similarity analysis (RSA) of an fMRI dataset where participants made familiarity judgments on written words. We also compare those results to univariate regions of interest (uROI) taken from previous sentences > pseudowords contrasts. RSA with word stimuli defined in terms of their semantic distance showed greater correspondence with neural patterns in mROI than uROI. This was confirmed in two independent datasets, one involving single-word recognition, and the other focused on the meaning of noun-noun phrases by contrasting meaningful phrases > pseudowords. In all cases, areas of spatial overlap between mROI and uROI showed the greatest neural association. This suggests that ROIs defined in terms of multivariate reproducibility can help localize components of language such as semantics. The multivariate approach can also be extended to focus on other aspects of language such as phonology, and can be used along with the univariate approach for inclusively mapping language cortex.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMultivariate AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSemanticsYoung AdultFunctional magnetic resonance imagingLanguageMultivariate pattern analysisReadingRepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID38693340
PMCPMC11147878
OpenAlexW4396578808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.