Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693333›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Robust Ensemble of Two Different Multimodal Approaches to Segment 3D Ischemic Stroke Segmentation Using Brain Tumor Representation Among Multiple Center Datasets.

Hyunsu Jeong, Hyunseok Lim, Chiho Yoon, Jongjun Won, Grace Yoojin Lee, Ezequiel de la Rosa, Jan S Kirschke, Bumjoon Kim, Namkug Kim, Chulhong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hyunsu JeongGraduate School of Artificial Intelligence (GSAI), Department of Electrical Engineering, Medical Science and Engineering, and Medical Device Innovation Center, Convergence IT Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, South Korea.
Hyunseok LimGraduate School of Artificial Intelligence (GSAI), Department of Electrical Engineering, Medical Science and Engineering, and Medical Device Innovation Center, Convergence IT Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, South Korea.
Chiho YoonGraduate School of Artificial Intelligence (GSAI), Department of Electrical Engineering, Medical Science and Engineering, and Medical Device Innovation Center, Convergence IT Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, South Korea.
Jongjun WonDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Grace Yoojin LeeDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ezequiel de la Rosaicometrix, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan S KirschkeDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Neuroradiology Munich, Germany.
Bumjoon KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Convergence Medicine, Radiology, Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. medicj80@hanmail.net.
Namkug KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Convergence Medicine, Radiology, Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. namkugkim@gmail.com.
Chulhong KimGraduate School of Artificial Intelligence (GSAI), Department of Electrical Engineering, Medical Science and Engineering, and Medical Device Innovation Center, Convergence IT Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, South Korea. chulhong@postech.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7249-1257

Funding

Korea Medical Device Development Fund 1711195277Korea Medical Device Development Fund RS-2020-KD000008Ministry of Education 2020R1A6A1A03047902Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea 2021M3C1C3097624Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea 2023R1A2C3004880Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea No.2019-0-01906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke segmentation at an acute stage is vital in assessing the severity of patients' impairment and guiding therapeutic decision-making for reperfusion. Although many deep learning studies have shown attractive performance in medical segmentation, it is difficult to use these models trained on public data with private hospitals' datasets. Here, we demonstrate an ensemble model that employs two different multimodal approaches for generalization, a more effective way to perform on external datasets. First, after we jointly train a segmentation model on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) MR modalities, the model is inferred on the DWI images. Second, a channel-wise segmentation model is trained by concatenating the DWI and ADC images as input, and then is inferred using both MR modalities. Before training with ischemic stroke data, we utilized BraTS 2021, a public brain tumor dataset, for transfer learning. An extensive ablation study evaluates which strategy learns better representations for ischemic stroke segmentation. In our study, nnU-Net well-known for robustness is selected as our baseline model. Our proposed method is evaluated on three different datasets: the Asan Medical Center (AMC) I and II, and the 2022 Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES). Our experiments are widely validated over a large, multi-center, and multi-scanner dataset with a huge amount of 846 scans. Not only stroke lesion models can benefit from transfer learning using brain tumor data, but combining the MR modalities using different training schemes also highly improves segmentation performance. The method achieved a top-1 ranking in the ongoing ISLES'22 challenge and performed particularly well on lesion-wise metrics of interest to neuroradiologists, achieving a Dice coefficient of 78.69% and a lesion-wise F1 score of 82.46%. Also, the method was relatively robust on the AMC I (Dice, 60.35%; lesion-wise F1, 68.30%) and II (Dice; 74.12%; lesion-wise F1, 67.53%) datasets in different settings. The high segmentation accuracy of our proposed method could improve radiologists' ability to detect ischemic stroke lesions in MRI images. Our model weights and inference code are available on https://github.com/MDOpx/ISLES22-model-inference .

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingIschemic StrokeBrainDatabases, FactualDatasets as TopicDeep LearningHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalGeneralizationIschemic stroke segmentationJoint trainingMultimodalTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID38693333
PMCPMC11522214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.