ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Subject-specific trunk segmental masses prediction for musculoskeletal models using artificial neural networks.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Thoraco-Lumbar Spine: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Pooled it
- A Muscle-Driven Spine Model for Predictive Simulations in the Design of Spinal Implants and Lumbar Orthoses.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate determination of body segment parameters is crucial for studying human movement and joint forces using musculoskeletal (MSK) models. However, existing methods for predicting segment mass have limited generalizability and sensitivity to body shapes. With recent advancements in machine learning, this study proposed a novel artificial neural network-based method for computing subject-specific trunk segment mass and center of mass (CoM) using only anthropometric measurements. We first developed, trained, and validated two artificial neural networks that used anthropometric measurements as input to predict body shape (ANN1) and tissue mass (ANN2). Then, we calculated trunk segmental mass for two volunteers using the predicted body shape and tissue mass. The body shape model (ANN1) was tested on 279 subjects, and maximum deviation between the predicted body shape and the original was 28 mm. The tissue mass model (ANN2) was evaluated on 223 subjects, which when compared to ground truth data, had a mean error of less than 0.51% in the head, trunk, legs, and arms. We also compared the two volunteer's trunk segment mass with experimental data and found similar trend and magnitude. Our findings suggested that the proposed method could serve as an effective and convenient tool for predicting trunk mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.