Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693270›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Deep learning in magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn's disease assessment: a systematic review.

Ofir Brem, David Elisha, Eli Konen, Michal Amitai, Eyal Klang

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ofir BremFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. ofirbrem@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0003-2693-9251
David ElishaFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eli KonenDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Michal AmitaiArrow Program for Research Education, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Eyal KlangArrow Program for Research Education, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crohn's disease (CD) poses significant morbidity, underscoring the need for effective, non-invasive inflammatory assessment using magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). This literature review evaluates recent publications on the role of deep learning in improving MRE for CD assessment. We searched MEDLINE/PUBMED for studies that reported the use of deep learning algorithms for assessment of CD activity. The study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Five eligible studies, encompassing 468 subjects, were identified. Our study suggests that diverse deep learning applications, including image quality enhancement, bowel segmentation for disease burden quantification, and 3D reconstruction for surgical planning are useful and promising for CD assessment. However, most of the studies are preliminary, retrospective studies, and have a high risk of bias in at least one category. Future research is needed to assess how deep learning can impact CD patient diagnostics, particularly when considering the increasing integration of such models into hospital systems.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedConvoluted neural networksCrohn’s diseaseDeep learningInflammatory bowel diseaseMRE

Identifiers

PMID38693270
PMCPMC11335790
OpenAlexW4396544472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.