Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693186›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Eye movements track prioritized auditory features in selective attention to natural speech.

Quirin Gehmacher, Juliane Schubert, Fabian Schmidt, Thomas Hartmann, Patrick Reisinger, Sebastian Rösch, Konrad Schwarz, Tzvetan Popov, Maria Chait, Nathan Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dissociable Pupil and Oculomotor Markers of Attention Allocation and Distractor Suppression during Listening.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Quirin GehmacherParis-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria. quirin.gehmacher@plus.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-2763
Juliane SchubertParis-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.
Fabian SchmidtParis-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9839-1614
Thomas HartmannParis-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-8125
Patrick ReisingerParis-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-708X
Sebastian RöschDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-6435
Konrad SchwarzMED-EL GmbH, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Tzvetan PopovMethods of Plasticity Research, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, CH-8050, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-1376
Maria ChaitEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7808-3593
Nathan WeiszParis-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) W 1233-BÖsterreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (Austrian Research Promotion Agency) 871232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decades, cognitive neuroscience has identified a distributed set of brain regions that are critical for attention. Strong anatomical overlap with brain regions critical for oculomotor processes suggests a joint network for attention and eye movements. However, the role of this shared network in complex, naturalistic environments remains understudied. Here, we investigated eye movements in relation to (un)attended sentences of natural speech. Combining simultaneously recorded eye tracking and magnetoencephalographic data with temporal response functions, we show that gaze tracks attended speech, a phenomenon we termed ocular speech tracking. Ocular speech tracking even differentiates a target from a distractor in a multi-speaker context and is further related to intelligibility. Moreover, we provide evidence for its contribution to neural differences in speech processing, emphasizing the necessity to consider oculomotor activity in future research and in the interpretation of neural differences in auditory cognition.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionEye MovementsSpeechAdultCognitionEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHearingHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleOcular Physiological PhenomenaSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID38693186
PMCPMC11063150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.