ArticleScientific reports2024
Structural monitoring data repair based on a long short-term memory neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A dynamic strain prediction method for malfunction of sensors in buildings subjected to seismic loads using CWT and CNN.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As construction technology and project management develop, structural monitoring systems become increasingly important for ensuring large-span spatial structure safety during construction and operation. However, most of the sensors and monitoring equipment in monitoring systems are poorly serviced, resulting in frequent abnormal monitoring data, which directly leads to challenges in data analysis and structural safety assessment. In this paper, a structural response recovery method based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network is proposed by studying the autocorrelation of data and the spatial correlations among data at multiple measurement points. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method are verified using the monitored stress data for a grid structure jacking construction process, and the influence of different data loss rates on the recovery accuracy is analysed. The recovery models are compared using a support vector machine and a Multi-Layer Perception (MLP) neural network. The proposed method can effectively restore missing data; notably, the MSE index is 0.6, and the MAPE is below 15%. The data restoration method based on the LSTM neural network is more accurate than the traditional method. Finally, the repair applicability of various types of monitored data is verified using the monitoring data from Hall F of Qingdao Jiao-dong International Airport under typhoon conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.