Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38693150›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2024

Edible mycelium as proliferation and differentiation support for anchorage-dependent animal cells in cultivated meat production.

Minami Ogawa, Alex S Kermani, Mayrene J Huynh, Keith Baar, J Kent Leach, David E Block

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Edible Sulfonated Soy Protein Microcarriers for Cultivated Meat Cell Expansion.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Bioprocess Engineering for Cultivated Meat.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Edible Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of the Protein Profile of aFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minami OgawaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3892-8122
Alex S KermaniDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Mayrene J HuynhDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0145-5690
Keith BaarDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
J Kent LeachDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1673-3335
David E BlockDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. deblock@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1582-6641
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2021132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated meat production requires bioprocess optimization to achieve cell densities that are multiple orders of magnitude higher compared to conventional cell culture techniques. These processes must maximize resource efficiency and cost-effectiveness by attaining high cell growth productivity per unit of medium. Microcarriers, or carriers, are compatible with large-scale bioreactor use, and offer a large surface-area-to-volume ratio for the adhesion and proliferation of anchorage-dependent animal cells. An ongoing challenge persists in the efficient retrieval of cells from the carriers, with conflicting reports on the effectiveness of trypsinization and the need for additional optimization measures such as carrier sieving. To surmount this issue, edible carriers have been proposed, offering the advantage of integration into the final food product while providing opportunities for texture, flavor, and nutritional incorporation. Recently, a proof of concept (POC) utilizing inactivated mycelium biomass derived from edible filamentous fungus demonstrated its potential as a support structure for myoblasts. However, this POC relied on a model mammalian cell line combination with a single mycelium species, limiting realistic applicability to cultivated meat production. This study aims to advance the POC. We found that the species of fungi composing the carriers impacts C2C12 myoblast cell attachment-with carriers derived from Aspergillus oryzae promoting the best proliferation. C2C12 myoblasts effectively differentiated on mycelium carriers when induced in myogenic differentiation media. Mycelium carriers also supported proliferation and differentiation of bovine satellite cells. These findings demonstrate the potential of edible mycelium carrier technology to be readily adapted in product development within the cultivated meat industry.

Identifiers

PMID38693150
PMCPMC11063153
OpenAlexW4396553533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.