Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38692845›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024

Metagenomic analysis of microbial consortia native to the Amazon, Highlands, and Galapagos regions of Ecuador with potential for wastewater remediation.

Juan José Guadalupe, Miguel Pazmiño-Vela, Gabriela Pozo, Wendy Vernaza, Valeria Ochoa-Herrera, Maria de Lourdes Torres, Andres F Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan José GuadalupeLaboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-1228-3688
Miguel Pazmiño-VelaLaboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0009-0006-0580-2813
Gabriela PozoLaboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-8760-2060
Wendy VernazaColegio de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito, Ecuador.
Valeria Ochoa-HerreraColegio de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-2079
Maria de Lourdes TorresLaboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-4568
Andres F TorresLaboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Calle Diego de Robles y Avenida Pampite, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0009-0009-5665-1463

Funding

Universidad San Francisco de Quito Collaboration Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native microbial consortia have been proposed for biological wastewater treatment, but their diversity and function remain poorly understood. This study investigated three native microalgae-bacteria consortia collected from the Amazon, Highlands, and Galapagos regions of Ecuador to assess their metagenomes and wastewater remediation potential. The consortia were evaluated for 12 days under light (LC) and continuous dark conditions (CDC) to measure their capacity for nutrient and organic matter removal from synthetic wastewater (SWW). Overall, all three consortia demonstrated higher nutrient removal efficiencies under LC than CDC, with the Amazon and Galapagos consortia outperforming the Highlands consortium in nutrient removal capabilities. Despite differences in α- and β-diversity, microbial species diversity within and between consortia did not directly correlate with their nutrient removal capabilities. However, all three consortia were enriched with core taxonomic groups associated with wastewater remediation activities. Our analyses further revealed higher abundances for nutrient removing microorganisms in the Amazon and Galapagos consortia compared with the Highland consortium. Finally, this study also uncovered the contribution of novel microbial groups that enhance wastewater bioremediation processes. These groups have not previously been reported as part of the core microbial groups commonly found in wastewater communities, thereby highlighting the potential of investigating microbial consortia isolated from ecosystems of megadiverse countries like Ecuador.

Indexed as

BacteriaMetagenomicsMicrobial ConsortiaWastewaterBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEcuadorMetagenomeMicroalgaeWater PurificationWastewater

Identifiers

PMID38692845
PMCPMC11062868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.