Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38692731›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ketamine versus ketamine and behavioural activation therapy for adults with treatment-resistant depression in the community.

Ben Beaglehole, Richard Porter, Katie Douglas, Cameron James Lacey, Aroha de Bie, Jennifer Jordan, Charlie Mentzel, Bridgette Thwaites, Jenni Manuel, Greg Murray and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ben BeagleholePsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand ben.beaglehole@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-1745
Richard PorterPsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Katie DouglasPsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5344-2959
Cameron James LaceyPsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Aroha de BieTe Whatu Ora-Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Jennifer JordanPsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Charlie MentzelDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Bridgette ThwaitesPsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Jenni ManuelPsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Greg MurrayCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher FramptonPsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Paul GluePsychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZDunedin Public Hospital · NZSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Canterbury · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough short-term benefits follow parenteral ketamine for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TR-MDD), there are challenges that prevent routine use of ketamine by clinicians. These include acute dissociative effects of parenteral ketamine, high relapse rates following ketamine dosing and the uncertain role of psychotherapy. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) seeks to establish the feasibility of evaluating repeated oral doses of ketamine and behavioural activation therapy (BAT), compared with ketamine treatment alone, for TR-MDD. We also aim to compare relapse rates between treatment arms to determine the effect size of adding BAT to oral ketamine. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospectively registered, two-centre, single-blind RCT. We aim to recruit 60 participants with TR-MDD aged between 18 and 65 years. Participants will be randomised to 8 weeks of oral ketamine and BAT, or 8 weeks of oral ketamine alone. Feasibility will be assessed by tracking attendance for ketamine and BAT, acceptability of treatment measures and retention to the study follow-up protocol. The primary efficacy outcome measure is the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) measured weekly during treatment and fortnightly during 12 weeks of follow-up. Other outcome measures will assess the tolerability of ketamine and BAT, cognition and activity (using actigraphy). Participants will be categorised as non-responders, responders, remitters and relapsed during follow-up. MADRS scores will be analysed using a linear mixed model. For a definitive follow-up RCT study to be recommended, the recruitment expectations will be met and efficacy outcomes consistent with a >20% reduction in relapse rates favouring the BAT and ketamine arm will be achieved. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the New Zealand Central Health and Disability Ethics Committee (reference: 2023 FULL18176). Study findings will be reported to participants, stakeholder groups, conferences and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UTN: U1111-1294-9310, ACTRN12623000817640p.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantKetamineAdolescentAdultAgedBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultKetamineAdult psychiatryDepression & mood disordersPsychosocial Intervention

Identifiers

PMID38692731
PMCPMC11086269
OpenAlexW4396567545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.