Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38692725›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Chiropractic spinal manipulation and likelihood of tramadol prescription in adults with radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study using US data.

Robert James Trager, Zachary A Cupler, Roshini Srinivasan, Regina M Casselberry, Jaime A Perez, Jeffery A Dusek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert James TragerConnor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Robert.Trager@UHhospitals.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4714-1076
Zachary A CuplerPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitative Services, Butler VA Health Care System, Butler, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5537-9810
Roshini SrinivasanConnor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Regina M CasselberryClinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jaime A PerezClinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jeffery A DusekConnor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USDuke University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients receiving chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) for low back pain (LBP) are less likely to receive any opioid prescription for subsequent pain management. However, the likelihood of specifically being prescribed tramadol, a less potent opioid, has not been explored. We hypothesised that adults receiving CSM for newly diagnosed radicular LBP would be less likely to receive a tramadol prescription over 1-year follow-up, compared with those receiving usual medical care.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingUS medical records-based dataset including >115 million patients attending academic health centres (TriNetX, Inc), queried 9 November 2023.

participantsOpioid-naive adults aged 18-50 with a new diagnosis of radicular LBP were included. Patients with serious pathology and tramadol use contraindications were excluded. Variables associated with tramadol prescription were controlled via propensity matching.

interventionsPatients were divided into two cohorts dependent on treatment received on the index date of radicular LBP diagnosis (CSM or usual medical care). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk ratio (RR) for tramadol prescription (primary); markers of usual medical care utilisation (secondary).

resultsAfter propensity matching, there were 1171 patients per cohort (mean age 35 years). Tramadol prescription was significantly lower in the CSM cohort compared with the usual medical care cohort, with an RR (95% CI) of 0.32 (0.18 to 0.57; p<0.0001). A cumulative incidence graph demonstrated that the reduced incidence of tramadol prescription in the CSM cohort relative to the usual medical care cohort was maintained throughout 1-year follow-up. Utilisation of NSAIDs, physical therapy evaluation and lumbar imaging was similar between cohorts.

conclusionsThis study found that US adults initially receiving CSM for radicular LBP had a reduced likelihood of receiving a tramadol prescription over 1-year follow-up. These findings should be corroborated by a prospective study to minimise residual confounding.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidLow Back PainManipulation, ChiropracticTramadolAdolescentAdultDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidTramadolcomplementary medicinepain managementrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID38692725
PMCPMC11086504
OpenAlexW4396566699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.