Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38691751›Full record

ArticleOptics letters2024

Spiral scanning improves subject fixation in widefield retinal imaging.

Franklin Wei, Claire Y Li, Kristen Hagan, Sandra S Stinnett, Anthony N Kuo, Joseph A Izatt, Al-Hafeez Dhalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optics letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franklin Wei
Claire Y Li
Kristen Hagan
Sandra S Stinnett
Anthony N Kuo
Joseph A Izatt
Al-Hafeez Dhalla

Funding

Widefield Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Optimized for Pediatric and Neonatal ImagingR21EY033515 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DHALLA, AL-HAFEEZ ZAHIR, TOTH, CYNTHIA ANN · 2022 to 2023
$443k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY033515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point scanning retinal imaging modalities, including confocal scanning light ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) and optical coherence tomography, suffer from fixational motion artifacts. Fixation targets, though effective at reducing eye motion, are infeasible in some applications (e.g., handheld devices) due to their bulk and complexity. Here, we report on a cSLO device that scans the retina in a spiral pattern under pseudo-visible illumination, thus collecting image data while simultaneously projecting, into the subject's vision, the image of a bullseye, which acts as a virtual fixation target. An imaging study of 14 young adult volunteers was conducted to compare the fixational performance of this technique to that of raster scanning, with and without a discrete inline fixation target. Image registration was used to quantify subject eye motion; a strip-wise registration method was used for raster scans, and a novel, to the best of our knowledge, ring-based method was used for spiral scans. Results indicate a statistically significant reduction in eye motion by the use of spiral scanning as compared to raster scanning without a fixation target.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularOphthalmoscopyRetinaAdultEye MovementsHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38691751
PMCPMC11068122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.