Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38691664›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of therapeutics

Effectiveness of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir for the Prevention of COVID-19-Related Hospitalization and Mortality: A Systematic Literature Review.

Ashley S Cha-Silva, Meghan B Gavaghan, Tobias Bergroth, Ronika Alexander-Parrish, Jingyan Yang, Florin Draica, Jaymin Patel, Denise A Garner, Richard H Stanford, Genevieve Meier and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of therapeutics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley S Cha-SilvaPfizer, New York, NY.
Meghan B GavaghanPfizer, New York, NY.
Tobias BergrothPfizer, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ronika Alexander-ParrishPfizer, New York, NY.
Jingyan YangPfizer, New York, NY.
Florin DraicaPfizer, New York, NY.
Jaymin PatelAESARA, Chapel Hill, NC.
Denise A GarnerAESARA, Chapel Hill, NC.
Richard H StanfordAESARA, Chapel Hill, NC.
Genevieve MeierAESARA, Chapel Hill, NC.
John M McLaughlinPfizer, New York, NY.
Jennifer L NguyenPfizer, New York, NY.
Pfizer (United States) · USTelesage (United States) · USPfizer (Sweden) · SE

Funding

Pfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) is an oral antiviral drug used to treat mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients aged 12 years or older at high risk of progression to severe disease (eg, hospitalization and death). Despite being the preferred option for outpatient treatment in the majority of countries worldwide, NMV/r is currently underutilized in real-world clinical practice. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: As numerous real-world studies have described patient outcomes following treatment with NMV/r, this systematic literature review provides a comprehensive summary of evidence on NMV/r effectiveness against hospitalization and mortality further organized by clinically meaningful categories, such as acute versus longer-term follow-up, age, underlying health conditions, and vaccination status, to help inform health care decision making. DATA SOURCES: We searched Embase and PubMed (December 22, 2021-March 31, 2023) and congress abstracts (December 1, 2021-December 31, 2022) for reports describing NMV/r effectiveness. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: In total, 18 real-world studies met final selection criteria. The evidence showed that NMV/r significantly reduced postinfection risk of all-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality in both acute (≤30 days) (21%-92%) and longer-term (>30 days) (1%-61%) follow-up. The reduction in postinfection risk was higher when treatment was received within 5 days of symptom onset. Real-world effectiveness of NMV/r treatment was observed regardless of age, underlying high-risk conditions, and vaccination status.

conclusionThe systematic literature review findings demonstrated the effectiveness of NMV/r against hospitalization and mortality during the Omicron period among individuals at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19 disease.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug CombinationsRitonavirCOVID-19HospitalizationHumansLactamsLeucineNitrilesProlineSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsDrug CombinationsLactamsLeucinenirmatrelvir and ritonavir drug combinationNitrilesProlineRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID38691664
PMCPMC11060058
OpenAlexW4396543287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.