Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38691356›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Safety and Tolerability of Online Adaptive High-Field Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy.

Jasmijn M Westerhoff, Lois A Daamen, John P Christodouleas, Erwin L A Blezer, Ananya Choudhury, Rosalyne L Westley, Beth A Erickson, Clifton D Fuller, Shaista Hafeez, Uulke A van der Heide and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Polygenic Risk Score for Late Bladder Toxicity Following Radiotherapy for Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: a systematic literature review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Jasmijn M WesterhoffUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lois A DaamenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
John P ChristodouleasElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erwin L A BlezerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ananya ChoudhuryDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Rosalyne L WestleyThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom.
Beth A EricksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Shaista HafeezThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom.
Uulke A van der HeideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn P W IntvenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anna M KirbyThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom.
Susan LalondrelleThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom.
Bruce D MinskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Stella MookDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marlies E NoweeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Corrie A M MarijnenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kristina M OrrlingLygature, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Arjun SahgalSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher J SchultzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Corinne Faivre-FinnDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Robbert J H A TersteegDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alison C TreeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom.
Chia-Lin TsengSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tine SchytteDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Dustin M SilkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Dave EggertElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marco LuzzaraElekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Helena M VerkooijenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
William A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLInstitute of Cancer Research · GBMedical College of Wisconsin · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USElekta (Sweden) · SERoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBHealth Sciences Centre · CAHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USLygature · NLOdense University Hospital · DKSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001438 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI WIDLANSKY, MICHAEL E · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
Cancer Research UKNCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001438NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In 2018, the first online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system using a 1.5-T MR-equipped linear accelerator (1.5-T MR-Linac) was clinically introduced. This system enables online adaptive radiotherapy, in which the radiation plan is adapted to size and shape changes of targets at each treatment session based on daily MR-visualized anatomy. Objective: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and technical feasibility of treatment with a 1.5-T MR-Linac, specifically focusing on the subset of patients treated with an online adaptive strategy (ie, the adapt-to-shape [ATS] approach). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac enrolled in Multi Outcome Evaluation for Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM), a large prospective international study of MRgRT between February 2019 and October 2021. Included were adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Data were collected in Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the US. Data were analyzed in August 2023. Exposure: All patients underwent MRgRT using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Radiation prescriptions were consistent with institutional standards of care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patterns of care, tolerability, and technical feasibility (ie, treatment completed as planned). Acute high-grade radiotherapy-related toxic effects (ie, grade 3 or higher toxic effects according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) occurring within the first 3 months after treatment delivery. Results: In total, 1793 treatment courses (1772 patients) were included (median patient age, 69 years [range, 22-91 years]; 1384 male [77.2%]). Among 41 different treatment sites, common sites were prostate (745 [41.6%]), metastatic lymph nodes (233 [13.0%]), and brain (189 [10.5%]). ATS was used in 1050 courses (58.6%). MRgRT was completed as planned in 1720 treatment courses (95.9%). Patient withdrawal caused 5 patients (0.3%) to discontinue treatment. The incidence of radiotherapy-related grade 3 toxic effects was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.9%-2.0%) in the entire cohort and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%) in the subset of patients treated with ATS. There were no radiotherapy-related grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients treated on a 1.5-T MR-Linac, radiotherapy was safe and well tolerated. Online adaptation of the radiation plan at each treatment session to account for anatomic variations was associated with a low risk of acute grade 3 toxic effects.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38691356
PMCPMC11063805
OpenAlexW4396561906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.