ArticleJAMA network open2024
Safety and Tolerability of Online Adaptive High-Field Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study of Adaptive Radiotherapy for High-Grade Glioma Based on Interfraction MRI.Cancer medicine · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for accurate delineation of radiotherapy: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Global hotspots and trends of stereotactic radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric analysis and visual analysis from 2015 to 2025.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Initial Experience with MR-Guided or CT-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- A new perspective on radiotherapy in the comprehensive treatment of cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Leveraging large language models to populate structured clinical case report forms from unstructured medical notes in radiation oncology.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Innovative radiotherapy strategies in advanced colon cancer with oligometastasis: a case of online adaptive radiotherapy and lattice stereotactic re-irradiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Long-term patient experience with online MR-guided radiotherapy: adaptive versus non-adaptive workflow.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- History and Development of Clinical Use of Functional Stereotaxy for Radiation Oncologists: From Its Origins to Its Current State.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Article
- A Polygenic Risk Score for Late Bladder Toxicity Following Radiotherapy for Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Online Radiotherapy: The Paradigm Shift to Real-Time Adaptive Radiotherapy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: a systematic literature review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025Review
- Optimal timing of organs-at-risk-sparing adaptive radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer under re-planning resource constraints.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Optimal Timing of Organs-at-Risk-Sparing Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Head- and-Neck Cancer under Re-planning Resource Constraints.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Radioresistance and brain metastases: a review of the literature and applied perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In 2018, the first online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system using a 1.5-T MR-equipped linear accelerator (1.5-T MR-Linac) was clinically introduced. This system enables online adaptive radiotherapy, in which the radiation plan is adapted to size and shape changes of targets at each treatment session based on daily MR-visualized anatomy. Objective: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and technical feasibility of treatment with a 1.5-T MR-Linac, specifically focusing on the subset of patients treated with an online adaptive strategy (ie, the adapt-to-shape [ATS] approach). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac enrolled in Multi Outcome Evaluation for Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM), a large prospective international study of MRgRT between February 2019 and October 2021. Included were adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Data were collected in Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the US. Data were analyzed in August 2023. Exposure: All patients underwent MRgRT using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Radiation prescriptions were consistent with institutional standards of care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patterns of care, tolerability, and technical feasibility (ie, treatment completed as planned). Acute high-grade radiotherapy-related toxic effects (ie, grade 3 or higher toxic effects according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) occurring within the first 3 months after treatment delivery. Results: In total, 1793 treatment courses (1772 patients) were included (median patient age, 69 years [range, 22-91 years]; 1384 male [77.2%]). Among 41 different treatment sites, common sites were prostate (745 [41.6%]), metastatic lymph nodes (233 [13.0%]), and brain (189 [10.5%]). ATS was used in 1050 courses (58.6%). MRgRT was completed as planned in 1720 treatment courses (95.9%). Patient withdrawal caused 5 patients (0.3%) to discontinue treatment. The incidence of radiotherapy-related grade 3 toxic effects was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.9%-2.0%) in the entire cohort and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%) in the subset of patients treated with ATS. There were no radiotherapy-related grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients treated on a 1.5-T MR-Linac, radiotherapy was safe and well tolerated. Online adaptation of the radiation plan at each treatment session to account for anatomic variations was associated with a low risk of acute grade 3 toxic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.