ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
Application and subgroup analysis of competing risks model based on different lymph node staging systems in differentiated thyroid cancer.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Superior prognostic performance of modified N staging incorporating N1c in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A LODDS-based nomogram for overall and cancer-specific survival in stage III-IV gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Association between types of surgery and cancer-specific death in patients with early differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy, with a rising incidence worldwide. Accurate prognostic models are essential for effective patient management. This study evaluates the prognostic value of various lymph node staging systems in DTC using a competing risks model. We used SEER database records (1998-2016) of 16,527 DTC patients, analyzing N stage, positive lymph node numbers (PLNNs), metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and log odds of the negative lymph node (NLN)/T stage ratio (LONT). Univariate and multivariate analyses in a competing risks model were performed, along with subgroup analyses based on demographic and clinical characteristics. In this study of 16,527 patients with DTC, different lymph node staging systems showed different prognostic correlations in univariate and multivariate analyses. In particular, PLNNs showed significant prognostic correlations in several subgroups. Additionally, PLNNs were more suitable as a lymph node staging system for DTC than LODDS and MLNR in N1 stage subgroups, with an optimal cut-off of 13. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves and nomograms improved the clinical utility of the prognostic model based on PLNNs. Using competing risks model and subgroup analyses, we found that PLNNs had the best prognostic discriminatory efficacy for patients with DTC, especially those with N1 stage disease, and had an optimal cut-off value of 13.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38691331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.