Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38691207›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2024

Manometric esophagogastric junction barrier metrics as predictors of gastroesophageal reflux.

Shaili Babbar, Matthew Omara, Abraham Khan, Rita Knotts

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Simplifying the esophagogastric junction contractile integral calculation.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. Future perspectives in esophageal manometry.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaili BabbarNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Shaili.babbar@nyulangone.org.ORCID 0009-0001-3983-3347
Matthew OmaraDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Esophageal Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Abraham KhanDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Esophageal Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Rita KnottsDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Esophageal Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-resolution manometry (HRM) tools, like esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI), assess EGJ barrier function. GOALS: This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between manometric EGJ metrics with esophageal acid exposure. STUDY: We conducted a retrospective review of 284 patients who underwent HRM and ambulatory reflux testing between 11/2017-1/2020. EGJ-CI and total-EGJ-CI were manually calculated. Pathologic acid exposure was defined as pH  < 4 with esophageal acid exposure time (EAET) exceeding 6.0%. Pearson's correlation, univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized to assess the relationships between pathologic acid exposure and EGJ parameters. Sensitivity and specificity thresholds for EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI were optimized with ROC analyses.

resultsOn univariable analysis, patients with pathologic acid exposure had increased odds of having lower mean basal LES pressures, EGJ-CI, and total EGJ-CI than patients without pathologic acid exposure. On multivariable analysis, age, EGJ-CI and mean DCI were significant predictors of pathologic acid exposure. There were significant, though weak, correlations between EAET and EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI (r =  - 0.18,  - 0.19, p < 0.01, respectively). An EGJ-CI cutoff of 44.16 as a predictor for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 42% (AUC 0.60). Total EGJ-CI cutoff of 11,461.3 for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 43% (AUC 0.62).

conclusionEGJ-CI can independently predict pathologic acid exposure. However, the poor correlation between EGJ-CI and acid exposure, as well as the low sensitivity and specificity of calculated thresholds, indicate that mechanisms other than EGJ barrier function may impact acid exposure.

Indexed as

Esophageal pH MonitoringEsophagogastric JunctionGastroesophageal RefluxManometryAdultAgedFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityEsophagogastric junctionGastroesophageal refluxManometry

Identifiers

PMID38691207
OpenAlexW4396547038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.