Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38691091›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Gut Microbiota Profiles in Myopes and Nonmyopes.

Wan E W Omar, Gurdeep Singh, Andrew J McBain, Fiona Cruickshank, Hema Radhakrishnan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06638606 (Microbiota Profiles in Newly Married Couples), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06638606 completednot on this map

Microbiota Profiles in Newly Married Couples: Potential Effects on Vision, Sleep and Psychometric Parameters

TypeobservationalSponsorReza RastmaneshRan2024 to 2024Enrolled1,740ConditionsSleep Deprivation, Gut Microbiota, Optometry Examinations, Oral MicrobiotaArmsSleep improvement techniques
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin DBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of gut microbiomes in different ocular pathologies: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. HarnessingGut microbes · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Potential protective role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring the Ocular Surface Microbiome and Tear Proteome in Glaucoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wan E W OmarFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gurdeep SinghFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Andrew J McBainFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Fiona CruickshankFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Hema RadhakrishnanFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GBUniversiti Teknologi MARA · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To identify compositional differences in the gut microbiome of nonmyopes (NM) and myopes using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and to investigate whether the microbiome may contribute to the onset or progression of the condition. Methods: Faecal samples were collected from 52 adult participants, of whom 23 were NM, 8 were progressive myopes (PM), and 21 were stable myopes (SM). The composition of the gut microbiota in each group was analysed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Results: There were no significant differences in alpha and beta diversity between the three groups (NM, PM, and SM). However, the distributions of Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Megamonas, Faecalibacterium, Coprococcus, Dorea, Roseburia, and Blautia were significantly higher in the myopes (SM and PM combined) when compared with emmetropes. The myopes exhibited significantly greater abundance of bacteria that are linked to the regulation of dopaminergic signalling, such as Clostridium, Ruminococcus, Bifidobacterium, and Bacteroides. Individuals with stable myopia were found to have a significantly higher proportion of Prevotella copri than those with progressive myopia. Bifidobacterium adolescentis, a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producing bacterium, was significantly higher in all myopes than in NM and, in the comparison between SM and PM, it is significantly higher in SM. B. uniformis and B. fragilis, both GABA-producing Bacteroides, were present in relatively high abundance in all myopes and in SM compared with PM, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of bacteria related to dopamine effect and GABA-producing bacteria in the gut microbiome of myopes may suggest a role of these microorganisms in the onset and progression of myopia.

Indexed as

FecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAdultBacteriaDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyopiaYoung AdultDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38691091
PMCPMC11077909
OpenAlexW4396658517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.