Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38690775›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2024

Automated Machine Learning and Explainable AI (AutoML-XAI) for Metabolomics: Improving Cancer Diagnostics.

Olatomiwa O Bifarin, Facundo M Fernández

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olatomiwa O BifarinSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-0881
Facundo M FernándezSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Deep Ovarian Cancer MetabolomicsR01CA218664 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Facundo Martin Fernandez, Jaeyeon Kim · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics generates complex data necessitating advanced computational methods for generating biological insight. While machine learning (ML) is promising, the challenges of selecting the best algorithms and tuning hyperparameters, particularly for nonexperts, remain. Automated machine learning (AutoML) can streamline this process; however, the issue of interpretability could persist. This research introduces a unified pipeline that combines AutoML with explainable AI (XAI) techniques to optimize metabolomics analysis. We tested our approach on two data sets: renal cell carcinoma (RCC) urine metabolomics and ovarian cancer (OC) serum metabolomics. AutoML, using Auto-sklearn, surpassed standalone ML algorithms like SVM and k-Nearest Neighbors in differentiating between RCC and healthy controls, as well as OC patients and those with other gynecological cancers. The effectiveness of Auto-sklearn is highlighted by its AUC scores of 0.97 for RCC and 0.85 for OC, obtained from the unseen test sets. Importantly, on most of the metrics considered, Auto-sklearn demonstrated a better classification performance, leveraging a mix of algorithms and ensemble techniques. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) provided a global ranking of feature importance, identifying dibutylamine and ganglioside GM(d34:1) as the top discriminative metabolites for RCC and OC, respectively. Waterfall plots offered local explanations by illustrating the influence of each metabolite on individual predictions. Dependence plots spotlighted metabolite interactions, such as the connection between hippuric acid and one of its derivatives in RCC, and between GM3(d34:1) and GM3(18:1_16:0) in OC, hinting at potential mechanistic relationships. Through decision plots, a detailed error analysis was conducted, contrasting feature importance for correctly versus incorrectly classified samples. In essence, our pipeline emphasizes the importance of harmonizing AutoML and XAI, facilitating both simplified ML application and improved interpretability in metabolomics data science.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsMachine LearningMetabolomicsOvarian NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansBiomarkers, Tumorautomated machine learningcancer biologyexplainable AImetabolomicsShapley additive explanations

Identifiers

PMID38690775
PMCPMC11157651
OpenAlexW4396554600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.