Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38690747›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

Evaluation of the Impact of Concentration and Extraction Methods on the Targeted Sequencing of Human Viruses from Wastewater.

Minxi Jiang, Audrey L W Wang, Nicholas A Be, Nisha Mulakken, Kara L Nelson, Rose S Kantor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minxi JiangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0796-2590
Audrey L W WangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Nicholas A BePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Nisha MulakkenComputing and Global Security Directorates, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Kara L NelsonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-2662
Rose S KantorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-8979
University of California, Berkeley · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequencing human viruses in wastewater is challenging due to their low abundance compared to the total microbial background. This study compared the impact of four virus concentration/extraction methods (Innovaprep, Nanotrap, Promega, and Solids extraction) on probe-capture enrichment for human viruses followed by sequencing. Different concentration/extraction methods yielded distinct virus profiles. Innovaprep ultrafiltration (following solids removal) had the highest sequencing sensitivity and richness, resulting in the successful assembly of several near-complete human virus genomes. However, it was less sensitive in detecting SARS-CoV-2 by digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) compared to Promega and Nanotrap. Across all preparation methods, astroviruses and polyomaviruses were the most highly abundant human viruses, and SARS-CoV-2 was rare. These findings suggest that sequencing success can be increased using methods that reduce nontarget nucleic acids in the extract, though the absolute concentration of total extracted nucleic acid, as indicated by Qubit, and targeted viruses, as indicated by dPCR, may not be directly related to targeted sequencing performance. Further, using broadly targeted sequencing panels may capture viral diversity but risks losing signals for specific low-abundance viruses. Overall, this study highlights the importance of aligning wet lab and bioinformatic methods with specific goals when employing probe-capture enrichment for human virus sequencing from wastewater.

Indexed as

WastewaterGenome, ViralHumansSARS-CoV-2VirusesWastewaterhuman virusnucleic acid extractionprobe-capture enrichmenttargeted sequencingvirus concentrationwastewater-based epidemiologywastewater-based surveillance

Identifiers

PMID38690747
PMCPMC11097627
OpenAlexW4396554689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.