Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38690539›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2024

Temporal validation of a clinical prediction rule for distinguishing locomotive syndromes in community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study from the DETECt-L study.

Shigeharu Tanaka, Ryo Tanaka, Hungu Jung, Shunsuke Yamashina, Yu Inoue, Kazuhiko Hirata, Kai Ushio, Yasunari Ikuta, Yukio Mikami, Nobuo Adachi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shigeharu TanakaPhysical Therapy Major, School of Rehabilitation, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ryo TanakaGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hungu JungGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shunsuke YamashinaGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yu InoueDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science and Social Welfare, Kibi International University, Takahashi, Okayama, Japan.
Kazuhiko HirataDivision of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Practice and Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kai UshioDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yasunari IkutaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukio MikamiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobuo AdachiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JPHiroshima University Hospital · JPKibi International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical prediction rules are used to discriminate patients with locomotive syndrome and may enable early detection. This study aimed to validate the clinical predictive rules for locomotive syndrome in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: We assessed the clinical prediction rules for locomotive syndrome in a cross-sectional setting. The age, sex, and body mass index of participants were recorded. Five physical function tests-grip strength, single-leg standing time, timed up-and-go test, and preferred and maximum walking speeds-were measured as predictive factors. Three previously developed clinical prediction models for determining the severity of locomotive syndrome were assessed using a decision tree analysis. To assess validity, the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and post-test probability of the clinical prediction rules were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for each model. Results: Overall, 280 older adults were included (240 women; mean age, 74.8 ± 5.2 years), and 232 (82.9%), 68 (24.3%), and 28 (10.0%) participants had locomotive syndrome stages ≥ 1, ≥ 2, and = 3, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves were 0.701, 0.709, and 0.603, in models 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The accuracies of models 1 and 2 were moderate. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the models are reliable for community-dwelling older adults.

Indexed as

AgingClinical prediction ruleLocomotive syndromeValidation

Identifiers

PMID38690539
PMCPMC11056409
OpenAlexW4392847269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.