ArticleCureus2024
Sinus Tachycardia Following COVID-19 and Its Implications.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Within the cardiovascular system, sinus tachycardia has been a noted finding in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome (symptoms persisting beyond 12 weeks post-infection). To better understand post-COVID-19 tachycardia, we examined the prevalence of sinus tachycardia 12-16 weeks after diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 infection and its correlation with intensive care utilization, ventilator use, and mortality in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Methods We identified adult patients in the TriNetX COVID-19 Research Network with confirmed SARS-COV-2 diagnosis from January 20th, 2020, to February 14th, 2022, and sinus tachycardia 12-16 weeks after diagnosis. Two cohorts were created: patients who developed tachycardia 12 weeks after initial diagnosis and patients without tachycardia. The tachycardia cohort was divided further based on vaccination status. Results Of 1,363,907 patients included, 30,705 (2.2%) developed tachycardia. The patients with tachycardia had more comorbidities. Using propensity score matching (PSM), two cohorts of 30,702 were created. The SARS-COV-2 tachycardic cohort had higher mortality (5.1% vs 2.1%, p<0.001), critical care utilization (5.8% vs 2.2%, p<0.001), and ventilator use (1.8% vs 0.5%, p<0.001). Out of 22,878 patients with persistent tachycardia and recorded vaccination status, 14,840 (65%) were not vaccinated. Mortality (5.9% vs 2.3%, p<0.001), critical care utilization (8.3% vs 3.6%, p<0.001), and ventilator use (3.8% vs 0.6%, p<0.001) were higher in the non-vaccinated patients compared with the vaccinated patients after PSM. Conclusion The prevalence of persistent tachycardia after SARS-COV-2 infection is notable at 2.2%. Patients with persistent tachycardia have higher mortality rates and demonstrate greater healthcare utilization at one year compared to patients without persistent tachycardia, particularly if unvaccinated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.