Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38690491›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Advancing Breast Cancer Research Through Collaborative Computing: Harnessing Google Colab for Innovation.

Sydney T Lam, Jonathan W Lam, Akshay J Reddy, Longines Lee, Zeyu Yu, Benjamin E Falkenstein, Victor W Fu, Evan Cheng, Rakesh Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sydney T LamMedicine, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Jonathan W LamMedicine, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Akshay J ReddyMedicine, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Longines LeeMedicine, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Zeyu YuMedicine, California Health Sciences University, Clovis, USA.
Benjamin E FalkensteinMedicine, California Health Sciences University, Clovis, USA.
Victor W FuMedicine, California Health Sciences University, Clovis, USA.
Evan ChengMedicine, California Health Sciences University, Clovis, USA.
Rakesh PatelInternal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This investigation explores the potential efficacy of machine learning algorithms (MLAs), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast cancer tissue through the analysis of 1000 breast cancer images gathered from Kaggle.com, a domain of publicly accessible data. The dataset was meticulously partitioned into training, validation, and testing sets to facilitate model development and evaluation. Our results reveal promising outcomes, with the developed model achieving notable precision (92%), recall (92%), accuracy (92%), sensitivity (89%), specificity (96%), an F1 score of 0.92, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.944. These metrics underscore the model's ability to accurately identify malignant breast cancer images. Because of limitations such as sample size and potential variations in image quality, further research, data collection, and integration of theoretical models in a real-world clinical setting are needed to expand the reliability and generalizability of these MLAs. Nonetheless, this study serves to highlight the potential use of artificial intelligence models as supporting tools for physicians to utilize in breast cancer detection.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancermachine learningoncologypathology

Identifiers

PMID38690491
PMCPMC11058570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.