ArticleJTCVS open2024
Patient-specific tissue engineered vascular graft for aortic arch reconstruction.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small Diameter Vascular Grafts Made in Minutes.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Preclinical Validation of a Patient-Specific Patch-Planning Workflow for Congenital Cardiovascular Reconstruction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Application feasibility of virtual models and computational fluid dynamics for the planning and evaluation of aortic repair surgery for Williams syndrome.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: The complexity of aortic arch reconstruction due to diverse 3-dimensional geometrical abnormalities is a major challenge. This study introduces 3-dimensional printed tissue-engineered vascular grafts, which can fit patient-specific dimensions, optimize hemodynamics, exhibit antithrombotic and anti-infective properties, and accommodate growth. Methods: We procured cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with 4-dimensional flow for native porcine anatomy (n = 10), from which we designed tissue-engineered vascular grafts for the distal aortic arch, 4 weeks before surgery. An optimal shape of the curved vascular graft was designed using computer-aided design informed by computational fluid dynamics analysis. Grafts were manufactured and implanted into the distal aortic arch of porcine models, and postoperative cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data were collected. Pre- and postimplant hemodynamic data and histology were analyzed. Results: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of all pigs with 1:1 ratio of polycaprolactone and poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone demonstrated no specific dilatation or stenosis of the graft, revealing a positive growth trend in the graft area from the day after surgery to 3 months later, with maintaining a similar shape. The peak wall shear stress of the polycaprolactone/poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone graft portion did not change significantly between the day after surgery and 3 months later. Immunohistochemistry showed endothelization and smooth muscle layer formation without calcification of the polycaprolactone/poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone graft. Conclusions: Our patient-specific polycaprolactone/poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone tissue-engineered vascular grafts demonstrated optimal anatomical fit maintaining ideal hemodynamics and neotissue formation in a porcine model. This study provides a proof of concept of patient-specific tissue-engineered vascular grafts for aortic arch reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.