ArticleJTCVS open2024
Impact of maximum phonation time on postoperative dysphagia and prognosis after cardiac surgery.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Dysphagia After Cardiac Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The incidence of postoperative complications, including dysphagia, increases as the population undergoing cardiovascular surgery ages. This study aimed to explore the potential of maximum phonation time (MPT) as a simple tool for predicting postextubation dysphagia (PED) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Methods: This retrospective study included 442 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery at a university hospital. MPT was measured before surgery, and patients were stratified into 2 groups based on normal and abnormal MPTs. Postoperative complications, including PED and MACCEs, were also investigated. Swallowing status was assessed using the Food Intake Level Scale. Results: MPT predicted PED with prevalence of 11.0% and 18.0% in the normal and abnormal MPT groups, respectively ( Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential of MPT as a valuable tool in the preoperative assessment and management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. By incorporating MPT into routine preoperative evaluations, clinicians can identify patients at a higher risk of PED and MACCEs, allowing for targeted interventions and closer postoperative monitoring. This may improve patient outcomes and reduce the health care costs associated with these complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.