ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2024
Pulpotomy of mature teeth: A systematic analysis of the failed cases.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars utilizing 2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Review
- Intraoperative Identification of Vital Radicular Pulp in a Tooth Diagnosed with Pulp Necrosis: Four-Year Outcome of Tampon Pulpotomy.Iranian endodontic journal · 2026Article
- Clinical Challenges and Therapeutic Approaches in Managing Deep Carious Lesions Close to the Pulp in Permanent Teeth: A Narrative Review.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- Tissue Biocompatibility and Antimicrobial Properties of Sympathomimetic Nasal Solutions for Potential Use in Dental Pulpal Management.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulp therapy aims to maintain the health and integrity of teeth and their supporting tissue and preserve the vitality of the tooth pulp affected by dentinal caries or severe traumatic injury. Thus, the best clinical practice provides pulpal health or pathosis diagnosis and various therapeutic interventions evidenced in both the deciduous and permanent dentition for endodontic treatment. The pulp health status determines the type of pulpal therapy used. Vital pulp therapies for primary teeth include protective liners, pulp capping, and pulpotomy for reversible pulpitis; for permanent teeth, pulpotomy can be considered for irreversible pulpitis. For reversible or irreversible pulpitis, invasive management of decayed teeth has traditionally been performed. However, at present, coronal pulpotomy-like vital pulp therapy has led to successful treatment outcomes that are less invasive. Compared to root canal treatments, coronal pulpotomy is cost-effective, less time-consuming, and less technically demanding. The success of a pulpotomy depends on the clinician's experience, appropriate clinical techniques, and materials used. This narrative review provides insights into the systematic analysis of pulpotomy failure, causes and signs of failure, and alternative endodontic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.