ArticleOphthalmology science
A User-friendly Approach for the Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy Using ChatGPT and Automated Machine Learning.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Bibliographic Analysis.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Detecting Inflammation in Fundus Photographs Using Machine Learning.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Can Multimodal Large Language Models Diagnose Diabetic Retinopathy from Fundus Photos? A Quantitative Evaluation.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Large language models in ophthalmology: a scoping review on their utility for clinicians, researchers, patients, and educators.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Detection and classification of supraspinatus pathologies on shoulder magnetic resonance images using a code-free deep learning application.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025Article
- Code-Free Machine Learning for the Detection of Common Ophthalmic Diseases.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning-based anomaly detection and prediction in commercial aircraft using autonomous surveillance data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Large language models for disease diagnosis: a scoping review.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Article
- Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Review of Publications from Top Ophthalmology Journals.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Discriminative, generative artificial intelligence, and foundation models in retina imaging.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the capabilities of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) and Vertex AI in executing code-free preprocessing, training machine learning (ML) models, and analyzing the data. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants: ChatGPT and Vetrex AI as publicly available large language model and ML platform, respectively. Methods: ChatGPT was employed to improve the resolution of fundus photography images from the Methods to Evaluate Segmentation and Indexing Techniques in the field of Retinal Ophthalmology (Messidor-2) open-source dataset using the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) technique by Fiji software. Subsequently, Vertex AI, an automated ML (AutoML) platform, was utilized to develop 2 classification models. The first model served as a binary classifier for detecting the presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR), while the second determined its severity. Finally, ChatGPT was used to provide scripts for R and Python programming languages for data analysis and was also directly employed in analyzing the data in a code-free method. Main Outcome Measures: Evaluating the utility of ChatGPT in generating scripts for preprocessing images using Fiji and analyzing data across Python and R and assessing its potential in analyzing data through a code-free method. Investigating the capabilities of Vertex AI to train image classification models for detection of DR and its severity. Results: Two ML models were trained using 1740 images from the Messidor-2 database. The first model, designed to detect the severity of DR, achieved an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.81, with a precision rate of 81.81% and recall of 72.83%. The second model, tailored for the detection of the presence of DR, recorded a precision and recall of 84.48% with an AUPRC of 0.90. Conclusions: ChatGPT and Vertex AI have the potential to enable physicians without coding expertise to preprocess images, analyze data, and train ML models. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.