ArticleNational journal of maxillofacial surgery
Evaluation of the non-endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted platysma flap - A randomized control trial.
Article in National journal of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: As oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic progressive disorder, the treatment is based on the severity of the disease. Surgical treatment is the only choice for grade III and grade IV OSMF cases because the patient can neither clean his/her mouth nor properly chew. The resulting soft tissue defect requires resurfacing with various well-vascularized tissues such as extraoral flaps, intraoral flaps, microvascular flaps, and allografts that have been used. Reconstruction of the resultant defects proved to be challenging. Till date, none of the flaps has been proven to be effective and is universally accepted for the treatment of OSMF because of various drawbacks of the available techniques. This study was conducted to know whether an endoscopic-assisted platysma flap is associated with better outcomes in terms of ease of operation and postoperative function than the conventional approach. Materials and Methods: This study included 40 patients of grade III and grade IV OSMF reporting to the outpatient department of oral and maxillofacial surgery in a tertiary center of North India. These patients were divided randomly into two groups. Group I and Group II had 20 patients each, undergoing endoscopic-assisted platysma flap and non-endoscopic-assisted platysma flap for reconstruction after resection of OSMF bands, respectively. Data were analyzed for the mouth opening, operating time, flap viability, congestion of neck and oral cavity, signs of inflammation, neurologic assessment, and measurement of the drain. Results: The results showed significant increase in mouth opening from the preoperative value to the values immediately after surgery and at 24 h, 1 week, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery in both the study groups. Reduced bleeding incidence was found in group I compared to group II, with better postoperative outcomes noted during follow-up. But the mean intraoperative time of the subjects in group I was 130.80 ± 5.5.908 min and in group II was 105.74 ± 2. 491 min. Increased time taken in group I may be due to the long learning curve. Conclusion: The present study concluded that the Endoscope-assisted technique has a key role during supra and subplatysmal dissection to allow for better accessibility, handling, and visibility of the flap and its orientation in relation to the underlying structures to avoid postoperative complications and to overcome the drawback of platysma myocutaneous flap in reconstruction of OSMF defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.