Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38690147›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22024

Patient-specific quantification of cardiorespiratory motion for cardiac stereotactic radioablation treatment planning.

Adrian Petzl, Karim Benali, Nicolas Mbolamena, Katia Dyrda, Léna Rivard, Sebastian Seidl, Raphaël Martins, Martin Martinek, Helmut Pürerfellner, Martin Aguilar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adrian PetzlElectrophysiology Service, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Canada.
Karim BenaliDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, France.
Nicolas MbolamenaElectrophysiology Service, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Canada.
Katia DyrdaElectrophysiology Service, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Canada.
Léna RivardElectrophysiology Service, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Canada.
Sebastian SeidlDepartment of Internal Medicine 2/Cardiology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.
Raphaël MartinsDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Rennes University Hospital, France.
Martin MartinekDepartment of Internal Medicine 2/Cardiology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.
Helmut PürerfellnerDepartment of Internal Medicine 2/Cardiology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.
Martin AguilarElectrophysiology Service, Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac radioablation is a new treatment for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). The target for cardiac radioablation is subject to cardiorespiratory motion (CRM), the heart's movement with breathing and cardiac contraction. Data regarding the magnitude of target CRM are limited but are highly important for treatment planning. Objectives: The study sought to assess CRM amplitude by using ablation catheter geometrical data. Methods: Electroanatomic mapping data of patients undergoing catheter ablation for VT at 3 academic centers were exported. The spatial position of the ablation catheter as a function of time while in contact with endocardium was analyzed and used to quantify CRM. Results: Forty-four patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and VT contributed 1364 ablation lesions to the analysis. Average cardiac and respiratory excursion were 1.62 ± 1.21 mm and 12.12 ± 4.10 mm, respectively. The average ratio of respiratory to cardiac motion was approximately 11:1. CRM was greatest along the craniocaudal axis (9.66 ± 4.00 mm). Regional variations with respect to respiratory and cardiac motion were observed: basal segments had smaller displacements vs midventricular and apical segments. Patient characteristics (previous cardiac surgery, height, weight, body mass index, and left ventricular ejection fraction) had a statistically significant, albeit clinically moderate, impact on CRM. Conclusion: CRM is primarily determined by respiratory displacement and is modulated by the location of the target and the patient's biometric characteristics. The patient-specific quantification of CRM may allow to decrease treatment volume and reduce radiation exposure of surrounding organs at risk while delivering the therapeutic dose to the target.

Indexed as

3D mapping systemCardiac radioablationCardiorespiratory motionStereotactic body radiation therapyVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID38690147
PMCPMC11056453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.