Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38690035›Full record

ArticleFree neuropathology2024

Fluid preservation in brain banking: a review.

Andrew T McKenzie, Oge Nnadi, Kat D Slagell, Emma L Thorn, Kurt Farrell, John F Crary

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Free neuropathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew T McKenzieApex Neuroscience, Salem, Oregon, USA.
Oge NnadiBrain Preservation Foundation, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.
Kat D SlagellDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Emma L ThornDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Kurt FarrellDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
John F CraryDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USPreservation Virginia · US

Funding

Cell type atlasing of whole human brains using HOLiS: an optimized pipeline for staining, clearing, imaging, and analysisRF1MH128969 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HILLMAN, ELIZABETH M. C., OSTEN, PAVEL · 2021 to 2021
$9.1M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH128969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid preservation is nearly universally used in brain banking to store fixed tissue specimens for future research applications. However, the effects of long-term immersion on neural circuitry and biomolecules are not well characterized. As a result, there is a need to synthesize studies investigating fluid preservation of brain tissue. We searched PubMed and other databases to identify studies measuring the effects of fluid preservation in nervous system tissue. We categorized studies based on the fluid preservative used: formaldehyde solutions, buffer solutions, alcohol solutions, storage after tissue clearing, and cryoprotectant solutions. We identified 91 studies containing 197 independent observations of the effects of long-term storage on cellular morphology. Most studies did not report any significant alterations due to long-term storage. When present, the most frequent alteration was decreased antigenicity, commonly attributed to progressive crosslinking by aldehydes that renders biomolecules increasingly inaccessible over time. To build a mechanistic understanding, we discuss biochemical aspects of long-term fluid preservation. A subset of lipids appears to be chemical altered or extracted over time due to incomplete retention in the crosslinked gel. Alternative storage fluids mitigate the problem of antigen masking but have not been extensively characterized and may have other downsides. We also compare fluid preservation to cryopreservation, paraffin embedding, and resin embedding. Overall, existing evidence suggests that fluid preservation provides maintenance of neural architecture for decades, including precise structural details. However, to avoid the well-established problem of overfixation caused by storage in high concentration formaldehyde solutions, fluid preservation procedures can use an initial fixation step followed by an alternative long-term storage fluid. Further research is warranted on optimizing protocols and characterizing the generalizability of the storage artifacts that have been identified.

Indexed as

BiobankingFluid preservationFormaldehydeGlycerolOverfixationPostmortem brainStorage artifactTissue clearing

Identifiers

PMID38690035
PMCPMC11058410
OpenAlexW4396561374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.