Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689967›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Exploring optimal pathways for enterprise procurement management systems based on fast neural modeling and semantic segmentation.

Xiaodong Wang, Xinchao Shi, Junbo Chen, Xu Guo, Donghai Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaodong WangBusiness School, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou, China.
Xinchao ShiBusiness School, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou, China.
Junbo ChenSchool of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Xu GuoBusiness School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Donghai LiSchool of Government Management, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corporate procurement management assumes a pivotal role within the contemporary business landscape, yet confronts an array of challenges as markets continue to evolve and globalize. Conventional procurement management systems frequently grapple with issues of inefficiency, resource depletion, and noncompliance, necessitating the exploration of innovative avenues for optimization. This paper delves into the realm of risk mitigation associated with collusion behavior in the administration of intelligent procurement systems, presenting a novel procurement collusion identification model founded on a convolutional neural network (CNN) with reinforcement learning techniques. This framework commences with the application of a CNN and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for in-depth feature analysis and initial identification of historical procurement data, subsequently leveraging reinforcement learning methodologies to enhance the model's autonomy and intelligence for the purpose of optimization. Throughout the experimental phase, diverse domains of procurement data were meticulously selected for analysis. The empirical findings unequivocally demonstrate the model's proficiency, with an average recognition accuracy of 95.1% across five publicly available datasets. This performance surpasses existing machine learning methodologies employed in contemporary research and common recognition networks, thereby offering a pioneering reference point for the intelligent administration and optimization of future procurement systems.

Indexed as

CNNCollusion detectionLSTMPurchase managementReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID38689967
PMCPMC11059400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.