Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689900›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024

Energy Absorption of 3D Printed ABS and TPU Multimaterial Honeycomb Structures.

Nava Raj Khatri, Paul F Egan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nava Raj KhatriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8217-5394
Paul F EganDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in multimaterial 3D printing are enabling the construction of advantageous engineering structures that benefit from material synergies. Cellular structures, such as honeycombs, provide high-energy absorption to weight ratios that could benefit from multimaterial strategies to improve the safety and performance of engineered systems. In this study, we investigate the energy absorption for honeycombs with square and hexagonal unit cells constructed from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Honeycombs were fabricated and tested for out-of-plane and in-plane compression using ABS, TPU, and a combination of ABS with a central TPU band of tunable height. Out-of-plane energy absorption for square honeycombs increased from 2.2 kN·mm for TPU samples to 11.5 kN·mm for ABS samples and energy absorption of hexagonal honeycombs increased from 2.9 to 15.1 kN·mm as proportions of TPU/ABS were altered. In-plane loading demonstrated a sequential collapse of unit cell rows in square honeycombs with energy absorption of 0.1 to 2.6 kN·mm and a gradual failure of hexagonal honeycombs with energy absorption of 0.6 to 2.0 kN·mm. These results demonstrate how multimaterial combinations affect honeycomb compressive response by highlighting their benefits for controlled energy absorption and deformation for tunable performance in diverse engineering applications.

Indexed as

3D printingdesignfused deposition modelinghoneycombmechanicsmultimaterial printing

Identifiers

PMID38689900
PMCPMC11057531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.