Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024
Three-Dimensional Printing of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers by Digital Light Processing for Copper Ion Sequestration.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Strategies and Mechanisms of Nanomaterial-Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Synergistically Functionalized Biosensors for Biomarker Detection.Biosensors · 2026Review
- The Use of 3D-Printed Polymer Components for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Dyes from Water: A Systematic Literature Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Highly structured, molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) networks for copper(II) ion sequestration have been realized using the additive manufacturing technology. Photopolymerizable formulations with acrylic functional monomers and two different porogens (water and methanol) in different ratios were studied to produce emulsions with 50 vol% of the internal phase. The results of morphological characterization indicate that all MIPs have cauliflower-like multiscale structures that change as a function of the solvent combination and fabrication process. X-ray fluorescence microscopy maps presented a layered structure and homogeneous distribution of copper in the printed MIP. Copper(II) ion adsorption-desorption tests were performed on MIPs prepared using a three-dimensional (3D) printing approach and MIPs prepared by bulk polymerization. Results indicate that the 3D printed MIP is able to absorb copper up to ten times more efficiently than the nonprinted one and the printed MIP with 100% water content has the highest imprint recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.