Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689785›Full record

ReviewJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2024

Single-incision Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery: A Systemic Review, Meta-analysis, and Future Prospect.

Yozo Suzuki, Mitsuyoshi Tei, Masaki Wakasugi, Masahisa Ohtsuka, Kiyotaka Hagihara, Masakazu Ikenaga, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Masafumi Yamashita, Junzo Shimizu, Hiroki Akamatsu and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yozo SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi TeiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masaki WakasugiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masahisa OhtsukaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Kiyotaka HagiharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masakazu IkenagaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshitomo YanagimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masafumi YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Junzo ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroki AkamatsuDepartment of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Osaka Minato Central Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Naohiro TomitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi ImamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained some attention as a feasible alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) in colonic surgery, it became less prevalent than expected. Hence, we conducted this systematic review to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) with meta-analysis and discussion of the future prospect of SILS. The search was conducted from September to October 2023 using PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Articles on colorectal cancer comparing SILC with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) from all randomized controlled trials and comparative studies with 50 patients or more per arm were examined. The primary outcomes were the intra- and postoperative complication rates, and the secondary outcomes were the perioperative and oncological outcomes. The trends of the SILS number in Japan and the trends of the number of articles on SILS in PubMed were also reviewed. There were no significant differences in perioperative complication rates, operative factors, and oncological outcomes between SILC and MPLC, although heterogeneity was observed mainly in operative factors and the total length of the skin incision was significantly shorter in SILC. Therefore, SILC is technically and oncologically feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The case number of SILS was gradually increasing but the rate of SILS was decreasing in Japan. The number of articles on SILS was also decreasing. SILS has gained foothold to some extent but has plateaued. The emerging new robotic platform may reappraise the concept of SILS.

Indexed as

coloncolorectal cancerrobotic surgerysingle-incision laparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38689785
PMCPMC11056536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.