Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689738›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases2024

Bibliometric analysis for the identification of main limitations and future directions of vaccines for the control of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in Uganda.

José de la Fuente, Justus Rutaisire

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

José de la FuenteSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Ronda de Toledo 12, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain.
Justus RutaisireNational Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), National Agricultural Research Organization, Kampala P.O. Box 5704, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks and tick-borne diseases (TBD) are a growing threat for human and animal health worldwide with high incidence in African countries such as Uganda where it affects cattle health and production. Considering recent advances in bibliometric analysis, in this review we used a bibliometric descriptive approach for the analysis of publications and patents in the fields of ticks, TBD, and vaccines in Uganda. The results showed that major gaps and limitations are associated with (i) low contributions from Ugandan institutions, (ii) limited international collaborations, (iii) poor impact of translational research, and (iv) little research on tick control vaccines. The results were then used to propose future directions to approach these limitations in Uganda. Although ongoing initiatives and international collaborations are contributing to address major gaps and limitations, future directions should advance in these collaborative projects together with new initiatives addressing (i) basic and translational research on TBD such as CCHF and ASF, (ii) participation of Ugandan institutions in new international consortia in this area, (iii) promoting communication of these initiatives to Ugandan cattle holders and general population to attract support from public and private sectors, (iv) stimulate and support scientific publications and patents with participation of Ugandan scientists, and (v) build and implement production capacity for vaccines in Uganda. These results contribute to guiding Ugandan scientists and national authorities to face challenges posed by ticks and TBD with implications for other African countries.

Indexed as

AfricaBibliometricPathogenTickTick-borne diseasesUgandaVaccine

Identifiers

PMID38689738
PMCPMC11058720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.