Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689732›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive patients: a comprehensive review.

Laura Fontana, Silvia M Sirchia, Chiara Pesenti, Giovanni Maria Colpi, Monica R Miozzo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Hydroalcoholic Extract ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura FontanaMedical Genetics Unit, Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriali (ASST) Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Silvia M SirchiaMedical Genetics, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Chiara PesentiMedical Genetics Unit, Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriali (ASST) Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Maria ColpiNext Fertility Procrea, International Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Lugano, Switzerland.
Monica R MiozzoMedical Genetics Unit, Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriali (ASST) Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in reproductive medicine have guided novel strategies for addressing male infertility, particularly in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Two prominent invasive interventions, namely testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), have emerged as key techniques to retrieve gametes for assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Both heterogeneity and complexity of NOA pose a multifaceted challenge to clinicians, as the invasiveness of these procedures and their unpredictable success underscore the need for more precise guidance. Seminal plasma can be aptly regarded as a liquid biopsy of the male reproductive tract, encompassing secretions from the testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, bulbourethral glands, and prostate. This fluid harbors a variety of cell-free nucleic acids, microvesicles, proteins, and metabolites intricately linked to gonadal activity. However, despite numerous investigations exploring potential biomarkers from seminal fluid, their widespread inclusion into the clinical practice remains limited. This could be partially due to the complex interplay of diverse clinical and genetic factors inherent to NOA that likely contributes to the absence of definitive biomarkers for residual spermatogenesis. It is conceivable that the integration of clinical data with biomarkers could increase the potential in predicting surgical procedure outcomes and their choice in NOA cases. This comprehensive review addresses the challenge of sperm retrieval in NOA through non-invasive biomarkers. Moreover, we delve into promising perspectives, elucidating innovative approaches grounded in multi-omics methodologies, including genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. These cutting-edge techniques, combined with the clinical and genetics features of patients, could improve the use of biomarkers in personalized medical approaches, patient counseling, and the decision-making continuum. Finally, Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential in the realm of combining biomarkers and clinical data, also in the context of identifying non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaBiomarkersSperm RetrievalHumansInfertility, MaleMaleSemenSpermatogenesisBiomarkersinfertilitynon-invasive biomarkersnon-obstructive azoospermiareproductive medicineTESE

Identifiers

PMID38689732
PMCPMC11058837
OpenAlexW4394850460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.