Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689593›Full record

ArticlePain reports2024

Counting your chickens before they hatch: improvements in an untreated chronic pain population, beyond regression to the mean and the placebo effect.

Monica Sean, Alexia Coulombe-Lévêque, William Nadeau, Anne-Catherine Charest, Marylie Martel, Guillaume Léonard, Pascal Tétreault

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Placebo and nocebo effect in pain.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monica SeanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-3413
Alexia Coulombe-LévêqueFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
William NadeauFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Anne-Catherine CharestFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Marylie MartelFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Guillaume LéonardFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Pascal TétreaultFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9061-0635
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Isolating the effect of an intervention from the natural course and fluctuations of a condition is a challenge in any clinical trial, particularly in the field of pain. Regression to the mean (RTM) may explain some of these observed fluctuations. Objectives: In this paper, we describe and quantify the natural trajectory of questionnaire scores over time, based on initial scores. Methods: Twenty-seven untreated chronic low back pain patients and 25 healthy controls took part in this observational study, wherein they were asked to complete an array of questionnaires commonly used in pain studies during each of 3 visits (V1, V2, V3) at the 2-month interval. Scores at V1 were classified into 3 subgroups (extremely high, normal, and extremely low), based on z-scores. The average delta (∆ = V2 - V1) was calculated for each subgroup, for each questionnaire, to describe the evolution of scores over time based on initial scores. This analysis was repeated with the data for V2 and V3. Results: Our results show that high initial scores were widely followed by more average scores, while low initial scores tended to be followed by similar (low) scores. Conclusion: These trajectories cannot be attributable to RTM alone because of their asymmetry, nor to the placebo effect as they occurred in the absence of any intervention. However, they could be the result of an Effect of Care, wherein participants had meaningful improvements simply from taking part in a study. The improvement observed in patients with high initial scores should be carefully taken into account when interpreting results from clinical trials.

Indexed as

Chronic painEffect of carePain questionnairesRegression to the mean

Identifiers

PMID38689593
PMCPMC11057814
OpenAlexW4396540868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.