Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689577›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2024

Fatigue and Metabolic Responses during Repeated Sets of Bench Press Exercise to Exhaustion at Different Ranges of Motion.

Athanasios Tsoukos, Michał Krzysztofik, Michal Wilk, Adam Zajac, Michail G Panagiotopoulos, Ilias-Iason Psarras, Despina P Petraki, Gerasimos Terzis, Gregory C Bogdanis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Athanasios TsoukosSchool of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-6412
Michał KrzysztofikInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2797-8431
Michal WilkInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-6337
Adam ZajacInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-4822
Michail G PanagiotopoulosSchool of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ilias-Iason PsarrasSchool of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Despina P PetrakiSchool of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Gerasimos TerzisSchool of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0049-5395
Gregory C BogdanisSchool of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3382-0438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the acute effects of different ranges of motion (ROM) on fatigue and metabolic responses during repeated sets of bench press exercise. Ten resistance trained men performed three sets to momentary failure with two-min rest intervals at three different ROM: full ROM (FULL), and partial ROM in which the barbell was moved either at the bottom half (BOTTOM) or the top half (TOP) of the full barbell vertical displacement. In TOP, a higher load was lifted, and a higher total number of repetitions was performed compared to FULL and BOTTOM (130 ± 17.6 vs. 102.5 ± 15.9 vs. 98.8 ± 17.5 kg; 55.2 ± 9.8, 32.2 ± 6.5 vs. 49.1 ± 16.5 kg, respectively p < 0.01). Work per repetition was higher in FULL than TOP and BOTTOM (283 ± 43 vs. 205 ± 32 vs. 164 ± 31 J/repetition, p < 0.01). Mean barbell velocity at the start of set 1 was 21.7% and 12.8% higher in FULL compared to TOP and BOTTOM, respectively. The rate of decline in mean barbell velocity was doubled from set 1 to set 3 (p < 0.01) and was higher in FULL than both TOP and BOTTOM (p < 0.001). Also, the rate of mean barbell velocity decline was higher in BOTTOM compared to TOP (p = 0.045). Blood lactate concentration was similarly increased in all ROM (p < 0.001). Training at TOP ROM allowed not only to lift a higher load, but also to perform more repetitions with a lower rate of decline in mean barbell velocity. Despite the lower absolute load and work per repetition, fatigue was higher in BOTTOM than TOP and this may be attributed to differences in muscle length.

Indexed as

blood lactatemuscle lengthvelocity-based training

Identifiers

PMID38689577
PMCPMC11057609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.